Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37508792›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Use of Tactile Sensors in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Overview.

Pietro Navalesi, Calogero Maria Oddo, Glauco Chisci, Andrea Frosolini, Paolo Gennaro, Vincenzo Abbate, Domenico Prattichizzo, Guido Gabriele

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pietro NavalesiThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Calogero Maria OddoDepartment of Information Engineering, Università di Pisa, 56127 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1489-5701
Glauco ChisciDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, School of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6992-324X
Andrea FrosoliniMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1347-4013
Paolo GennaroMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Vincenzo AbbateHead and Neck Section, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Science, Federico II University of Naples, 80013 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7905-0531
Domenico PrattichizzoDepartment of Information Engineering and Mathematics, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Guido GabrieleMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis overview aimed to characterize the type, development, and use of haptic technologies for maxillofacial surgical purposes. The work aim is to summarize and evaluate current advantages, drawbacks, and design choices of presented technologies for each field of application in order to address and promote future research as well as to provide a global view of the issue.

methodsRelevant manuscripts were searched electronically through Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases until 1 November 2022.

resultsAfter analyzing the available literature, 31 articles regarding tactile sensors and interfaces, sensorized tools, haptic technologies, and integrated platforms in oral and maxillofacial surgery have been included. Moreover, a quality rating is provided for each article following appropriate evaluation metrics. DISCUSSION: Many efforts have been made to overcome the technological limits of computed assistant diagnosis, surgery, and teaching. Nonetheless, a research gap is evident between dental/maxillofacial surgery and other specialties such as endovascular, laparoscopic, and microsurgery; especially for what concerns electrical and optical-based sensors for instrumented tools and sensorized tools for contact forces detection. The application of existing technologies is mainly focused on digital simulation purposes, and the integration into Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) is far from being widely actuated. Virtual reality, increasingly adopted in various fields of surgery (e.g., sino-nasal, traumatology, implantology) showed interesting results and has the potential to revolutionize teaching and learning. A major concern regarding the actual state of the art is the absence of randomized control trials and the prevalence of case reports, retrospective cohorts, and experimental studies. Nonetheless, as the research is fast growing, we can expect to see many developments be incorporated into maxillofacial surgery practice, after adequate evaluation by the scientific community.

Indexed as

hapticmaxillofacialoralplatformsensorized toolssensorssurgery

Identifiers

PMID37508792
PMCPMC10376110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.