Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37508389›Full record

ArticleBiology2023

Similarity-Based Predictive Models: Sensitivity Analysis and a Biological Application with Multi-Attributes.

Jeniffer D Sanchez, Leandro C Rêgo, Raydonal Ospina, Víctor Leiva, Christophe Chesneau, Cecilia Castro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeniffer D SanchezDepartment of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Universidade Federal do Ceara, Fortaleza 60020-181, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1802-1953
Leandro C RêgoDepartment of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Universidade Federal do Ceara, Fortaleza 60020-181, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4091-024X
Raydonal OspinaDepartment of Statistics, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9884-9090
Víctor LeivaSchool of Industrial Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362807, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-4755-3270
Christophe ChesneauDepartment of Mathematics, Université de Caen, 14032 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1522-9292
Cecilia CastroCentre of Mathematics, Universidade do Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9897-8186

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive models based on empirical similarity are instrumental in biology and data science, where the premise is to measure the likeness of one observation with others in the same dataset. Biological datasets often encompass data that can be categorized. When using empirical similarity-based predictive models, two strategies for handling categorical covariates exist. The first strategy retains categorical covariates in their original form, applying distance measures and allocating weights to each covariate. In contrast, the second strategy creates binary variables, representing each variable level independently, and computes similarity measures solely through the Euclidean distance. This study performs a sensitivity analysis of these two strategies using computational simulations, and applies the results to a biological context. We use a linear regression model as a reference point, and consider two methods for estimating the model parameters, alongside exponential and fractional inverse similarity functions. The sensitivity is evaluated by determining the coefficient of variation of the parameter estimators across the three models as a measure of relative variability. Our results suggest that the first strategy excels over the second one in effectively dealing with categorical variables, and offers greater parsimony due to the use of fewer parameters.

Indexed as

biological datacoefficient of variationdata sciencedistance measuresestimation methodsMonte Carlo simulationpredictive modelingsimilarity functions

Identifiers

PMID37508389
PMCPMC10376039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.