Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37507807›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2023

Emergency team competencies: scoping review for the development of a tool to support the briefing and debriefing activities of emergency healthcare providers.

Gabriele Lorenzini, Alberto Zamboni, Luca Gelati, Alberto Di Martino, Alberto Pellacani, Nicolò Barbieri, Marcello Baraldi

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriele LorenziniEmergency Department Pavullo N/F, Azienda USL Di Modena, Modena, Italy. ga.lorenzini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4149-939X
Alberto ZamboniSimulation Center SIMANNU, Nuoro, Italy.
Luca GelatiAzienda USL Di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Alberto Di MartinoAzienda USL Di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Alberto PellacaniAzienda USL Di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Nicolò BarbieriAzienda USL Di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Marcello BaraldiAzienda USL Di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, at least one adverse event occurs in 10% of patients using emergency, inpatient, outpatient, surgical and primary care services. Particularly in emergency health care, this problem is exacerbated by additional variables such as patient criticality, high-risk diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and varying levels of healthcare provider training. In relation to the last point, briefing and debriefing activities during an emergency reinforce staff training and support them in managing work resources, planning interventions and improving future performance. The aim of the scoping review is to explore the state of the art in human factors applied to emergency situations and to develop a new tool to support healthcare professionals in conducting evidence-based briefings and debriefings. This review was developed using a search strategy based on the Arksey and O'Malley's six-step framework for scoping reviews. The literature analysed and the data identified, which are heterogeneous due to different study methodologies, objectives and types of interventions, suggest that human factors applied to emergency situations are still under-researched. At the end of the data extraction, analysis process, authors' reviews, discussion rounds and comparison with the multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers, 42 behaviours, 33 elements and 8 domains were considered relevant and included in the Emergency Team Comptencies (ETC) briefing and debriefing tool, ranked in order of priority as follows: communication, decision-making, clinical skills, situational awareness, leadership, task management, collaboration and stress and fatigue management. Further research is needed to investigate human factors applied to emergency situations and to generate new evidence to improve clinical practice and reduce the risk of error. In the near future, further studies will be conducted by the authors to test the validity of the Emergency Team Competencies tool in objectively measuring the performance of professionals and multidisciplinary teams.

Indexed as

BriefingDebriefingEmergency medicineHuman factorNon-technical skillsTechnical skills

Identifiers

PMID37507807
PMCPMC10386683
OpenAlexW4385341266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.