Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37507795›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

Study protocol: biomechanical testing, finite element analysis and prospective, randomized, clinical study of single screw cephalomedullary nailing versus integrated dual interlocking screw fixation for unstable (31A2

Andreas Panagopoulos, Evangelia Argyropoulou, Zinon T Kokkalis, Nicolaos Parchas, Konstantinos Tserpes

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas PanagopoulosDepartment of Orthopaedics, Patras University Hospital, Medical School, Patras University, Papanikolaou 1, 26504, Rio-Patras, Greece. andpan21@gmail.com.
Evangelia ArgyropoulouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Patras University Hospital, Medical School, Patras University, Papanikolaou 1, 26504, Rio-Patras, Greece.
Zinon T KokkalisDepartment of Orthopaedics, Patras University Hospital, Medical School, Patras University, Papanikolaou 1, 26504, Rio-Patras, Greece.
Nicolaos ParchasDepartment of Orthopaedics, Patras University Hospital, Medical School, Patras University, Papanikolaou 1, 26504, Rio-Patras, Greece.
Konstantinos TserpesLaboratory of Technology and Strength of Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
University of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHip fractures are an increasingly common consequence of falls in older people that are associated with a high risk of death and reduced function. The vast majority of intertrochanteric fractures require surgical treatment to withstand early mobilization and weight bearing, which prevents complications due to prolonged bed rest and aids in fracture healing.

methodsThis study is compromised by two parts, the experimental study and the clinical part. In the first part, a standard 130° nail will be used with the appropriate lag screw(s) and dynamic distal locking in synthetic osteoporotic femurs and the transmission of forces in the proximal femur, measured by a cortical surface-strain distribution, will be evaluated using digital image correlation. Finite element parametric models of the bone, the nails and their interface will be also developed. Finite element computations of surface strains in implanted femurs, after being validated against biomechanical testing measurements, will be used to assist the comparison of the nails by deriving important data on the developed stress and strain fields, which cannot be measured through biomechanical testing. In the other part, will set up a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study among the Gamma3 and IT cephalomedullary nailing, in order to investigate if there are any statistical important differences in the main radiological measurements and functional status in closed unstable intertrochanteric fractures (A21-3) in patients aged over 70 years old at the 24-week follow-up evaluation using patient reported disease-specific outcomes. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first to compare clinical, radiological and biomechanical measurements of the two different cephalomedullary nails. Our main hypothesis is that the IT nail would provide better radiological outcome and probably better clinical results than the Gama3 nail. Clinical trial registration International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15588442 , registered on 19/4/2022.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHip FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overBone NailsBone ScrewsChild, PreschoolFinite Element AnalysisHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomechanical testingFinite element analysisIntegrated dual interlocking screw nailingIntertrochanteric fracturesSingle cephalomedullary nailing

Identifiers

PMID37507795
PMCPMC10386776
OpenAlexW4385334835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.