Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37507753›Full record

ArticleBiological research2023

Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with wine fermentation and adaptation to nitrogen limitation in wild and domesticated yeast strains.

Eduardo I Kessi-Pérez, Eric Acuña, Camila Bastías, Leyanis Fundora, Manuel Villalobos-Cid, Andrés Romero, Sakshi Khaiwal, Matteo De Chiara, Gianni Liti, Francisco Salinas and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eduardo I Kessi-Pérez *Centro de Estudios en Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos (CECTA), Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile.
Eric Acuña *Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile.
Camila BastíasDepartamento de Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile.
Leyanis FundoraDepartamento de Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile.
Manuel Villalobos-CidDepartamento de Ingeniería Informática, Program for the Development of Sustainable Production Systems (PDSPS), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile.
Andrés RomeroLaboratorio de Genómica Funcional, Instituto de Bioquímica y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Sakshi KhaiwalUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, IRCAN, Nice, France.
Matteo De ChiaraUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, IRCAN, Nice, France.
Gianni LitiUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, IRCAN, Nice, France.
Francisco SalinasLaboratorio de Genómica Funcional, Instituto de Bioquímica y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Claudio MartínezCentro de Estudios en Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos (CECTA), Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile. claudio.martinez@usach.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-9287
Universidad de Santiago de Chile · CLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAustral University of Chile · CL

Funding

ANID/FONDECYT 11220533ANID/FONDECYT 1201104ANID/FONDECYT 1210955ANID/FONDEF IDeA I+D ID21I10198ANID/Millennium Science Initiative Program ICN17_022Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Innovación y Creación POSTDOC_DICYT 082171MF_AYUDANTE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than 20 years, Saccharomyces cerevisiae has served as a model organism for genetic studies and molecular biology, as well as a platform for biotechnology (e.g., wine production). One of the important ecological niches of this yeast that has been extensively studied is wine fermentation, a complex microbiological process in which S. cerevisiae faces various stresses such as limited availability of nitrogen. Nitrogen deficiencies in grape juice impair fermentation rate and yeast biomass production, leading to sluggish or stuck fermentations, resulting in considerable economic losses for the wine industry. In the present work, we took advantage of the "1002 Yeast Genomes Project" population, the most complete catalogue of the genetic variation in the species and a powerful resource for genotype-phenotype correlations, to study the adaptation to nitrogen limitation in wild and domesticated yeast strains in the context of wine fermentation. We found that wild and domesticated yeast strains have different adaptations to nitrogen limitation, corroborating their different evolutionary trajectories. Using a combination of state-of-the-art bioinformatic (GWAS) and molecular biology (CRISPR-Cas9) methodologies, we validated that PNP1, RRT5 and PDR12 are implicated in wine fermentation, where RRT5 and PDR12 are also involved in yeast adaptation to nitrogen limitation. In addition, we validated SNPs in these genes leading to differences in fermentative capacities and adaptation to nitrogen limitation. Altogether, the mapped genetic variants have potential applications for the genetic improvement of industrial yeast strains.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeWineFermentationNitrogenPolymorphism, Single NucleotideNitrogenAdaptationCRISPRDomesticationGWASNatural variationNitrogen limitationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeWild yeastsWine fermentationWine yeasts

Identifiers

PMID37507753
PMCPMC10385942
OpenAlexW4385377469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.