Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37507732›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

My Baby, My Move+: feasibility of a community prenatal wellbeing intervention.

Jenn A Leiferman, Rachael Lacy, Jessica Walls, Charlotte V Farewell, Mary K Dinger, Danielle Symons Downs, Sarah S Farrabi, Jennifer L Huberty, James F Paulson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jenn A LeifermanColorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado | Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. jenn.leiferman@cuanschutz.edu.
Rachael LacyColorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado | Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Jessica WallsColorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado | Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Charlotte V FarewellColorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado | Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Mary K DingerColorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado | Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 East 17th Place, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Danielle Symons DownsDepartment of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
Sarah S FarrabiGoldfarb School of Nursing at Barnes-Jewish College, 4483 Duncan Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Jennifer L HubertyCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 500 North 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
James F PaulsonDepartment of Psychology, Old Dominion University, 5115 Terminal Blvd, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USColorado School of Public Health · USArizona State University · USOld Dominion University · USPennsylvania State University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

National Institute of Health 5R21HD097450-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive gestational weight gain (EGWG), insufficient prenatal physical activity and sleep, and poor psychological wellbeing independently increase risks for adverse maternal and infant outcomes. A novel approach to mitigate these risks is utilizing peer support in a community-based prenatal intervention. This study assessed the feasibility (acceptability, demand, implementation, and practicality) of a remotely delivered prenatal physical activity intervention called My Baby, My Move + (MBMM +) that aims to increase prenatal physical activity, enhance mood and sleep hygiene, and reduce EGWG.

methodsParticipants were recruited through community organizations, local clinics, and social media platforms in the Fall of 2020 and Spring of 2021. Eligible pregnant women were randomized to either the MBMM + intervention or the control group. Each group met over Zoom for 16 sessions (twice weekly for 60 min over 8 weeks) to learn either behavioral change and wellbeing knowledge and skills (MBMM +) or knowledge and skills related to parenting (control group). Multiple methods of evaluation to better understand the feasibility of the intervention were conducted.

resultsA total of 49 women (25 MBMM + intervention, 24 control) completed both pre- and post-survey assessments and were included in the analyses. A subsample of 19 (39%) intervention participants completed a combination of semi-structured interviews/surveys to assess acceptability, demand, implementation, and practicality. Participants expressed positive feedback regarding acceptability (satisfaction and intent to continue use) and were extremely likely or likely to recommend the program to a friend (demand). Implementation metrics were assessed by observation and feedback forms completed by peer leaders and demonstrated high-quality control. Findings suggest that the intervention was practical due to remote sessions and cost-effectiveness.

conclusionThe MBMM + intervention was deemed to be a feasible intervention with high acceptability, demand, implementation, and practicality. These findings can be used to inform the scalability of the intervention and implementation of a larger efficacy trial.

trial registration19-1366, initial date is on January 23, 2020.

Indexed as

FeasibilityPeer interventionPerinatalPregnancyPrenatalWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID37507732
PMCPMC10375613
OpenAlexW4385347373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.