Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37507667›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2023

Volunteer-led online group exercise for community-dwelling older people: a feasibility and acceptability study.

S E R Lim, S J Meredith, S Agnew, E Clift, K Ibrahim, H C Roberts

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04672200 (Improving Physical Activity of Older People in Community Through Trained Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04672200 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Physical Activity of Older People in Community Through Trained Volunteers: the ImPACt Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsSedentary BehaviorArmsGroup exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S E R LimAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Mailpoint 807, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. s.e.lim@soton.ac.uk.
S J MeredithAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Mailpoint 807, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
S AgnewThe Brendoncare Foundation, Winchester, UK.
E CliftSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
K IbrahimAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Mailpoint 807, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
H C RobertsAcademic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Mailpoint 807, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Southampton General Hospital · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the clear benefits of physical activity in healthy ageing, engagement in regular physical activity among community-dwelling older adults remains low, with common barriers including exertional discomfort, concerns with falling, and access difficulties. The recent rise of the use of technology and the internet among older adults presents an opportunity to engage with older people online to promote increased physical activity. This study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of training volunteers to deliver online group exercises for older adults attending community social clubs.

methodsThis was a pre-post mixed-methods study. Older adults aged ≥ 65 years attending community social clubs who provided written consent and were not actively participating in exercise classes took part in the feasibility study. Older adults, volunteers, and staff were interviewed to determine the acceptability of the intervention. The intervention was a once weekly volunteer-led online group seated strength exercises using resistance bands. The duration of the intervention was 6 months. The primary outcome measures were the feasibility of the intervention (determined by the number of volunteers recruited, trained, and retained, participant recruitment and intervention adherence) and its acceptability to key stakeholders. Secondary outcome measures included physical activity levels (Community Health Model Activities Programme for Seniors (CHAMPS) questionnaire), modified Barthel Index, Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), frailty (PRISMA-7) and sarcopenia (SARC-F), at baseline and 6 months.

resultsNineteen volunteers were recruited, 15 (78.9%) completed training and 9 (47.3%) were retained after 1 year (mean age 68 years). Thirty older adults (mean age 77 years, 27 female) participated, attending 54% (IQR 37-67) of exercise sessions. Participants had no significant changes in secondary outcome measures, with a trend towards improvement in physical activity levels (physical activity in minutes per week at baseline was 1770 min, and 1909 min at six months, p = 0.13). Twenty volunteers, older adults, and staff were interviewed and found the intervention acceptable. The seated exercises were perceived as safe, manageable, and enjoyable.

conclusionsTrained volunteers can safely deliver online group exercise for community-dwelling older adults which was acceptable to older adults, volunteers, and club staff. TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04672200.

Indexed as

Independent LivingQuality of LifeAgedExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleVolunteersOlder adultsOnline exercisePhysical activityVolunteer

Identifiers

PMID37507667
PMCPMC10375749
OpenAlexW4385348128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.