Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37507660›Full record

SynthesisBMC microbiology2023

The prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ali Delgarm Shams-Abadi, Abdollah Mohammadian-Hafshejani, David L Paterson, Rezvan Arash, Elham Asadi Farsani, Asieh Taji, Hamid Heidari, Milad Shahini Shams Abadi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Integrated genomic analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic Diversity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ali Delgarm Shams-Abadi *Student Research Committee, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Abdollah Mohammadian-Hafshejani *Modeling in Health Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
David L PatersonUQ Center for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Rezvan ArashStudent Research Committee, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Elham Asadi FarsaniCellular and Molecular Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Asieh TajiInternational Campus, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Hamid HeidariDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. heidarii.hamid@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6869-2301
Milad Shahini Shams AbadiCellular and Molecular Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran. shahini_milad@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5264-3970
Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services · IRThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the first-line therapy of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections, colistin is one of the therapeutic options in cases of allergy or resistance to TMP-SMX. However, understanding the global status of resistance to colistin amongst S. maltophilia isolates could be helpful for appropriate antibiotic prescription. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical S. maltophilia isolates worldwide. According to eligibility criteria, a total of 61 studies were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence for colistin resistance was 42% (95% CI: 35-49%), ranging from 0.1 to 97%. Subgroups analysis indicated that, the pooled prevalence of colistin resistance was 44% (95% CI: 29-60%) in 15 studies during 2000-2010, and it was estimated to be 41% (95% CI: 33-50%) in 46 articles from 2011 to 2021. It was 46% (95% CI: 35-58%) in the studies that used broth microdilution method, and 39% (95% CI: 30-49%) in the studies with other used methods. The resistance rate in Asian countries was 45% (95% CI: 31-60%), in European countries was 45% (95% CI: 34-56%) and in the countries of North and South America was 33% (95% CI: 20-46%). Our review showed notable resistance to colistin in clinical S. maltophilia isolates. Given the estimated resistance rates, alternative antibiotics could be preferred to treat serious infections due to S. maltophilia.

Indexed as

Gram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsStenotrophomonas maltophiliaAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistinHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistinTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationColistin resistanceMeta-analysisStenotrophomonas maltophiliaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37507660
PMCPMC10386657
OpenAlexW4385343525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.