ArticleBehavior research methods2024
Minimal reporting guideline for research involving eye tracking (2023 edition).
Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the moving hand: How gesture meaning shapes visual attention during observation and imitation.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Abnormal Fixational Eye Movements in Ophthalmic Disease: Implications for Visual Function and Clinical Assessment.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Review
- Eye Tracking and AI-Generated Content: A Systematic Literature Review of Visual Attention, Cognitive Processing, and User Engagement.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Review
- Eye-tracking-while-reading: A living survey of datasets with open library support.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- The fundamentals of eye tracking, Part 7: Determining data quality.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Exploring how textual complexity affects cognitive load during reading: an eye-tracking study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gaze behaviors during forehand clear and backhand driving in badminton: a comparison between beginner, intermediate and expert players.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Saccadic variability in patients with Parkinson's disease.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- The fundamentals of eye tracking part 6: Working with areas of interest.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Mobile eye tracking in the real world: Best practices.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- What is socially constructed about race? A cross-national study of racial perception and categorization.PloS one · 2026Article
- Introducing the kollaR package: A user-friendly open-access solution for eye-tracking analysis and visualization.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- The effect of pupil size on data quality in head-mounted eye trackers.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Role of social competence in emotion processing among emerging adults with anxiety.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Coordinating Attention in Face-to-Face Collaboration: The Dynamics of Gaze, Pointing, and Verbal Reference.Cognitive science · 2025Article
- Cross-cultural analysis of eye-movement patterns in visual scene perception: a comparison of seven cultural samples.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- When is enough enough? Empirical guidelines to determine participant sample size for scene viewing studies.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Association of Virtual Nurses' Workflow and Cognitive Fatigue During Inpatient Encounters: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Oculomotor learning is evident during implicit motor sequence learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Young adults' visual attention to features of social media marketing for disposable e-cigarettes and associated perceptions.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A guideline is proposed that comprises the minimum items to be reported in research studies involving an eye tracker and human or non-human primate participant(s). This guideline was developed over a 3-year period using a consensus-based process via an open invitation to the international eye tracking community. This guideline will be reviewed at maximum intervals of 4 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.