Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37507647›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2024

Human talkers change their voices to elicit specific trait percepts.

Stella Guldner, Nadine Lavan, Clare Lally, Lisa Wittmann, Frauke Nees, Herta Flor, Carolyn McGettigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Disentanglement of prosodic meaning: Toward a framework for the analysis of nonverbal information in speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. The time course of person perception from voices in the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stella GuldnerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. stella.guldner@zi-mannheim.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7060-7711
Nadine LavanDepartment of Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7569-0817
Clare LallyDepartment of Speech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8121-6262
Lisa WittmannInstitute of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Frauke NeesInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Centre Schleswig Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-8234
Herta FlorInstitute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4809-5398
Carolyn McGettiganDepartment of Speech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6293-3795

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EE1406CLeverhulme Trust RL-2016-013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The voice is a variable and dynamic social tool with functional relevance for self-presentation, for example, during a job interview or courtship. Talkers adjust their voices flexibly to their situational or social environment. Here, we investigated how effectively intentional voice modulations can evoke trait impressions in listeners (Experiment 1), whether these trait impressions are recognizable (Experiment 2), and whether they meaningfully influence social interactions (Experiment 3). We recorded 40 healthy adult speakers' whilst speaking neutrally and whilst producing vocal expressions of six social traits (e.g., likeability, confidence). Multivariate ratings of 40 listeners showed that vocal modulations amplified specific trait percepts (Experiments 1 and 2), which could be explained by two principal components relating to perceived affiliation and competence. Moreover, vocal modulations increased the likelihood of listeners choosing the voice to be suitable for corresponding social goals (i.e., a confident rather than likeable voice to negotiate a promotion, Experiment 3). These results indicate that talkers modulate their voice along a common trait space for social navigation. Moreover, beyond reactive voice changes, vocal behaviour can be strategically used by talkers to communicate subtle information about themselves to listeners. These findings advance our understanding of non-verbal vocal behaviour for social communication.

Indexed as

VoiceAdultCommunicationHumansCommunicationImpressionsSelf-presentationSocial interactionsVoice production

Identifiers

PMID37507647
PMCPMC10866754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.