ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Preoperative prediction of disease-free survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients after R0 resection using contrast-enhanced CT and CA19-9.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combination of imaging features on pancreatic CT for predicting early recurrence after upfront pancreatoduodenectomy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Predictive value of preoperative CA19-9 and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for early recurrence in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- A risk score system including CT features for predicting early recurrence of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection: a dual-center retrospective study.European radiology · 2025Article
- Correlation of MRI characteristics with KRAS mutation status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- MRI-based risk stratification for predicting overall survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Preoperative risk stratification of early recurrence in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Novel equilibrium-phase-computed tomography biomarker of extracellular volume.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a CT-measured body composition radiomics model for prognostic assessment in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A nomogram to preoperatively predict the aggressiveness of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on CT features and 3D CT radiomic features.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Dual-energy CT extracellular volume fraction predicts tumor collagen ratio and possibly survival for inoperable pancreatic cancer patients.European radiology · 2025Article
- Evolving and Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Abdominal Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the efficiency of a combination of preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in predicting disease-free survival (DFS) after R0 resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
methodsA total of 138 PDAC patients who underwent curative R0 resection were retrospectively enrolled and allocated chronologically to training (n = 91, January 2014-July 2019) and validation cohorts (n = 47, August 2019-December 2020). Using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses, we constructed a preoperative clinicoradiographic model based on the combination of CECT features and serum CA19-9 concentrations, and validated it in the validation cohort. The prognostic performance was evaluated and compared with that of postoperative clinicopathological and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) models. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to verify the preoperative prognostic stratification performance of the proposed model.
resultsThe preoperative clinicoradiographic model included five independent prognostic factors (tumor diameter on CECT > 4 cm, extrapancreatic organ infiltration, CECT-reported lymph node metastasis, peripheral enhancement, and preoperative CA19-9 levels > 180 U/mL). It better predicted DFS than did the postoperative clinicopathological (C-index, 0.802 vs. 0.787; p < 0.05) and TNM (C-index, 0.802 vs. 0.711; p < 0.001) models in the validation cohort. Low-risk patients had significantly better DFS than patients at the high-risk, defined by the model preoperatively (p < 0.001, training cohort; p < 0.01, validation cohort).
conclusionsThe clinicoradiographic model, integrating preoperative CECT features and serum CA19-9 levels, helped preoperatively predict postsurgical DFS for PDAC and could facilitate clinical decision-making. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: We constructed a simple model integrating clinical and radiological features for the prediction of disease-free survival after curative R0 resection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; this novel model may facilitate preoperative identification of patients at high risk of recurrence and metastasis that may benefit from neoadjuvant treatments. KEY POINTS: • Existing clinicopathological predictors for prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients who underwent R0 resection can only be ascertained postoperatively and do not allow preoperative prediction. • We constructed a clinicoradiographic model, using preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) features and preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels, and presented it as a nomogram. • The presented model can predict disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with PDAC better than can postoperative clinicopathological or tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.