ArticleCJEM2023
Machine learning to identify attributes that predict patients who leave without being seen in a pediatric emergency department.
Article in CJEM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Machine Learning Strategy to Predict the Number of High-Acuity Children Who Leave Without Being Seen From the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Left Without Being Seen: A Scoping Review of a Silent Crisis in Emergency Departments.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2026Review
- Predicting patient risk of leaving without being seen using machine learning: a retrospective study in a single overcrowded emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Drinking from the Holy Grail-Does a Perfect Triage System Exist? And Where to Look for It?Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo characterize patients who left without being seen (LWBS) from a Canadian pediatric Emergency Department (ED) and create predictive models using machine learning to identify key attributes associated with LWBS.
methodsWe analyzed administrative ED data from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2020, from IWK Health ED in Halifax, NS. Variables included: visit disposition; Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS); triage month, week, day, hour, minute, and day of the week; sex; age; postal code; access to primary care provider; visit payor; referral source; arrival by ambulance; main problem (ICD10); length of stay in minutes; driving distance in minutes; and ED patient load. The data were randomly divided into training (80%) and test datasets (20%). Five supervised machine learning binary classification algorithms were implemented to train models to predict LWBS patients. We balanced the dataset using Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and used grid search for hyperparameter tuning of our models. Model evaluation was made using sensitivity and recall on the test dataset.
resultsThe dataset included 101,266 ED visits where 2009 (2%) records were excluded and 5800 LWBS (5.7%). The highest-performing machine learning model with 16 patient attributes was XGBoost which was able to identify LWBS patients with 95% recall and 87% sensitivity. The most influential attributes in this model were ED patient load, triage hour, driving minutes from home address to ED, length of stay (minutes since triage), and age.
conclusionOur analysis showed that machine learning models can be used on administrative data to predict patients who LWBS in a Canadian pediatric ED. From 16 variables, we identified the five most influential model attributes. System-level interventions to improve patient flow have shown promise for reducing LWBS in some centres. Predicting patients likely to LWBS raises the possibility of individual patient-level interventions to mitigate LWBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.