ArticleWorld journal of urology2023
Post-chemotherapy robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic germ cell tumors: safety and perioperative outcomes.
Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robot-assisted post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumors using two distinct surgical approaches: A tertiary care experience.Asian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer: state of the art and future perspectives.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Development of a predictive model for surgical difficulty assessment in distal gastrectomy of advanced gastric carcinoma using LASSO-random forest integrated algorithm.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Re: Post-chemotherapy robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic germ cell tumors: safety and perioperative outcomes. World J Urol. 2023 Jul 28. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04536-3.World journal of urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and early oncologic outcomes after post-chemotherapy robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RARPLND) for metastatic germ cell tumors (mGCT).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients from four tertiary centers who underwent PC-RARPLND for mGCT, from 2011 to 2021. Previous treatment of mGCT, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and early oncologic outcomes were assessed.
resultsOverall, 66 patients were included. The majority of patients had non-seminoma mTGCT (89%). Median size of retroperitoneal lymph node (RLN) before surgery was 26 mm. Templates of PC-RARPLND were left modified, right modified, and full bilateral in 56%, 27%, and 14%, respectively. Median estimated blood loss and length of stay were 50 mL [50-150] and 2 [1-3] days. Four patients (6.1%) had a vascular injury, only one with significant blood loss and conversion to open surgery (OS). Two other patients had a conversion to OS for difficulty of dissection. No patient had transfusion, most frequent complications were ileus (10.6%) and symptomatic lymphorrea (7.6%) and no complications grade IIIb or more occurred. With a median follow-up of 16 months, two patients had a relapse, all outside of the surgical template (one in the retrocrural space with reascending markers, one in lungs).
conclusionPC-RARPLND is a challenging surgery. In expert centers and for selected patients, it seemed safe and feasible, with a low morbidity. Further prospective evaluation of this procedure and long-term oncologic results are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.