Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37507425›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2023

The JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with COVID-19 triggered hyperinflammation: the RuxCoFlam trial.

J Hammersen, S Birndt, K Döhner, P Reuken, A Stallmach, P Sauerbrey, F La Rosée, M Pfirrmann, C Fabisch, M Weiss and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04338958 (A Phase-II Clinical Trial for First Line Treatment of Stage II/III Covid-19 Patients to Treat Hyperinflammation), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04338958 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase-II Clinical Trial for First Line Treatment of Stage II/III Covid-19 Patients to Treat Hyperinflammation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of JenaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled193ConditionsCovid-19ArmsRuxolitinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Mucosal implications of oral Jak3-targeted drugs in COVID patients.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The JAK-STAT pathway: from structural biology to cytokine engineering.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

J HammersenUniversitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Jena, Germany.
S BirndtUniversitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5430-899X
K DöhnerUniversitätsklinikum Ulm, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Hämatologie, Onkologie, Palliativmedizin, Rheumatologie und Infektionskrankheiten, Ulm, Germany.
P ReukenUniversitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin IV, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Interdisziplinäre Endoskopie, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7696-475X
A StallmachUniversitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin IV, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Interdisziplinäre Endoskopie, Jena, Germany.
P SauerbreyUniversitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Jena, Germany.
F La RoséeMedizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4310-3582
M PfirrmannInstitut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IBE), Medizinische Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
C FabischUniversitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Jena, Germany.
M WeissUniversitätsklinikum Ulm, Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Ulm, Germany.
K TrägerUniversitätsklinikum Ulm, Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Ulm, Germany.
H BremerSchwarzwald-Baar Klinikum, Lungenzentrum Donaueschingen, Donaueschingen, Germany.
S RussoSchwarzwald-Baar Klinikum, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv-, Notfall- und Schmerzmedizin, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
G IllerhausKlinikum Stuttgart, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie, Stammzelltransplantation und Palliativmedizin, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0009-8138
D DrömannUniversitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Medizinische Klinik III, Pulmologie, Lübeck, Germany.
S SchneiderSRH Klinikum Gera, Klinik für Pneumologie/Infektiologie, Hämatologie/Onkologie, Rheumatologie, Gera, Germany.
P La RoséeSchwarzwald-Baar Klinikum, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie, Onkologie, Immunologie, Infektiologie und Palliativmedizin, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6758-7809
A HochhausUniversitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Jena, Germany. andreas.hochhaus@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0626-0834
Jena University Hospital · DESchwarzwald-Baar Klinikum · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEKlinikum Stuttgart · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Hautkrankheiten · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DESRH Wald-Klinikum Gera · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysregulated hyperinflammatory response is key in the pathogenesis in patients with severe COVID-19 leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiorgan failure. Whilst immunosuppression has been proven to be effective, potential biological targets and optimal timing of treatment are still conflicting. We sought to evaluate efficacy and safety of the Janus Kinase 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, employing the previously developed COVID-19 Inflammation Score (CIS) in a prospective multicenter open label phase II trial (NCT04338958). Primary objective was reversal of hyperinflammation (CIS reduction of ≥25% at day 7 in ≥20% of patients). In 184 patients with a CIS of ≥10 (median 12) ruxolitinib was commenced at an initial dose of 10 mg twice daily and applied over a median of 14 days (range, 2-31). On day 7, median CIS declined to 6 (range, 1-13); 71% of patients (CI 64-77%) achieved a ≥25% CIS reduction accompanied by a reduction of markers of inflammation. Median cumulative dose was 272.5 mg/d. Treatment was well tolerated without any grade 3-5 adverse events related to ruxolitinib. Forty-four patients (23.9%) died, all without reported association to study drug. In conclusion, ruxolitinib proved to be safe and effective in a cohort of COVID-19 patients with defined hyperinflammation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Janus Kinase InhibitorsHumansInflammationJanus Kinase 1NitrilesProspective StudiesPyrazolesPyrimidinesTreatment OutcomeJAK1 protein, humanJanus Kinase 1Janus Kinase InhibitorsNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID37507425
PMCPMC10457200
OpenAlexW4385350624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.