Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37507310›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2024

Space agency-specific standards for crew dose and risk assessment of ionising radiation exposures for the International Space Station.

Mark Shavers, Edward Semones, Leena Tomi, Jing Chen, Ulrich Straube, Tatsuto Komiyama, Vyacheslav Shurshakov, Chunsheng Li, Werner Rühm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mark ShaversKBR Human Health and Performance, NASA Johnson Space Centre, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: mark.r.shavers@nasa.gov.
Edward SemonesNASA Space Radiation Analysis Group-Johnson Space Centre, Houston, TX, USA.
Leena TomiCanadian Space Agency, Saint-Hubert, Quebec, Canada.
Jing ChenRadiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ulrich StraubeEuropean Space Agency ESA, European Astronaut Center EAC, Space Medicine HRE-OM, Cologne, Germany.
Tatsuto KomiyamaJapan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Tsukuba Space Center, Ibaraki, Japan.
Vyacheslav ShurshakovInstitute for Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Chunsheng LiRadiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Werner RühmFederal Office of Radiation Protection, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Partner Agencies of the International Space Station (ISS) maintain separate career exposure limits and shared Flight Rules that control the ionising radiation exposures that crewmembers can experience due to ambient environments throughout their space missions. In low Earth orbit as well as further out in space, energetic ions referred to as galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) easily penetrate spacecraft and spacecraft contents and consequently are always present at low dose rates. Protons and electrons that are trapped in the Earth's geomagnetic field are encountered intermittently, and a rare energetic solar particle event (SPE) may expose crew to (mostly) energetic protons. Space radiation protection goals are to optimize radiation exposures to maintain deleterious late effects at known and acceptable levels and to prevent any early effects that might compromise crew health and mission success. The conventional radiation protection metric effective dose provides a basic framework for limiting exposures associated with human spaceflight and can be communicated to all stakeholders. Additional metrics and uncertainty analyses are required to understand more completely and to convey nuanced information about potential impacts to an individual astronaut or to a space mission. Missions to remote destinations well beyond low Earth orbit (BLEO) are upcoming and bestow additional challenges that shape design and radiation protection needs. NASA has recently adopted a more permissive career exposure limit based upon effective dose and new restrictions on mission exposures imposed by nuclear technologies. This manuscript reviews the exposure limits that apply to the ISS crewmembers. This work was performed in collaboration with the advisory and guidance efforts of International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Task Group 115 and will be summarized in an upcoming ICRP Report.

Indexed as

Cosmic RadiationRadiation MonitoringHumansProtonsRadiation DosageRisk AssessmentProtonsAstronautsExposure limitsInternational Space StationRadiation protectionRadiological protectionSpace radiation

Identifiers

PMID37507310
PMCPMC10919966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.