ReviewZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2024
Space agency-specific standards for crew dose and risk assessment of ionising radiation exposures for the International Space Station.
Review in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- CB001 bioactive compounds mitigate intestinal immune dysregulation induced by simulated microgravity and radiation via B cells modulation.Pharmaceutical biology · 2026Article
- Personalization and Fortification of In-Space Manufactured Emulsified Beverages for Long-Term Space Travel.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Spaceborne and spaceborn: Physiological aspects of pregnancy and birth during interplanetary flight.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Space Radiation and Cancer Risk in Astronauts: Models, Evidence, Uncertainties, and Emerging Imaging Perspectives.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Review
- Space radiation health risks to hematopoietic, neural, and gastrointestinal systems in astronauts.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Space radiation induces distinct senescent phenotypes: Implications for space travel.npj aging · 2025Article
- Concept and preliminary structural analysis of a crater-covering dome for future lunar habitats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pharmacological Innovations in Space: Challenges and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Review
- Establishment and activity of the planning and acting network for low dose radiation research in Japan (PLANET): 2016-2023.Journal of radiation research · 2024Article
- Nanomaterials for Potential Uses in Extraterrestrial Environments.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparison of dose and risk estimates between ISS Partner Agencies for a 30-day lunar mission.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Review
- System of radiological protection: Towards a consistent framework on Earth and in space.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- European astronaut radiation related cancer risk assessment using dosimetric calculations of organ dose equivalents.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Time-integrated radiation risk metrics and interpopulation variability of survival.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Application of multi-method-multi-model inference to radiation related solid cancer excess risks models for astronaut risk assessment.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Evaluation of deep space exploration risks and mitigations against radiation and microgravity.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Partner Agencies of the International Space Station (ISS) maintain separate career exposure limits and shared Flight Rules that control the ionising radiation exposures that crewmembers can experience due to ambient environments throughout their space missions. In low Earth orbit as well as further out in space, energetic ions referred to as galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) easily penetrate spacecraft and spacecraft contents and consequently are always present at low dose rates. Protons and electrons that are trapped in the Earth's geomagnetic field are encountered intermittently, and a rare energetic solar particle event (SPE) may expose crew to (mostly) energetic protons. Space radiation protection goals are to optimize radiation exposures to maintain deleterious late effects at known and acceptable levels and to prevent any early effects that might compromise crew health and mission success. The conventional radiation protection metric effective dose provides a basic framework for limiting exposures associated with human spaceflight and can be communicated to all stakeholders. Additional metrics and uncertainty analyses are required to understand more completely and to convey nuanced information about potential impacts to an individual astronaut or to a space mission. Missions to remote destinations well beyond low Earth orbit (BLEO) are upcoming and bestow additional challenges that shape design and radiation protection needs. NASA has recently adopted a more permissive career exposure limit based upon effective dose and new restrictions on mission exposures imposed by nuclear technologies. This manuscript reviews the exposure limits that apply to the ISS crewmembers. This work was performed in collaboration with the advisory and guidance efforts of International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Task Group 115 and will be summarized in an upcoming ICRP Report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.