ReviewJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2023
"Shortcuts" Causing Bias in Radiology Artificial Intelligence: Causes, Evaluation, and Mitigation.
Review in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07558746 (AI Reliance in Diagnostic Radiology Among Intern Doctors in Palestine), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
AI Reliance in Diagnostic Radiology Among Intern Doctors in Palestine: A Triple-Arm, Triple-Blind, Parallel-Design Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving racial fairness in brain age models using style-transfer synthesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Undertraining is the floor, not the ceiling: when statistical and validation failures compound in radiomics.European radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in urology: A review of United States Food and Drug Administration-cleared devices.BJU international · 2026Review
- Echo Chambers: Bias and Representation in Cardiac Imaging Datasets for Artificial Intelligence.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Incremental Diagnostic Value of Clinical Information for Large Language Models Across Multiple Organs: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Review
- Demographic Confounding in Voice-Based Parkinson Disease Screening: Methodological Analysis of the Bridge2AI Voice Dataset.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Review
- Bias and Fairness Across the Healthcare AI Lifecycle: A Clinician-Oriented Review.Balkan medical journal · 2026Review
- Clinical artificial intelligence applications of vision-language foundation models.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Airway segmentation on CT - A systematic review of machine learning tools.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Self-supervised representation learning reveals explainable physiological structure in high-dimensional magnetocardiography.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Imaging Protocols on Thermal Detection of Pressure Injuries: Threshold versus Deep Learning Across Skin Tones.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- On the predictability of progression-free survival in ovarian cancer from NanoString gene expression data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced echocardiography in cardiovascular disease management.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Mask of Truth: Model Sensitivity to Unexpected Regions of Medical Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- PulmoX-Net: a channel-attention enhanced deep learning model for multi-class pulmonary pathology classification in chest radiography.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evolution of CT perfusion software in stroke imaging: from deconvolution to artificial intelligence.European radiology · 2026Review
- Tumor-anchored deep feature random forests for out-of-distribution detection in lung cancer segmentation.Transactions on machine learning research · 2026Article
- LENS: A mammography-specific hybrid CNN-Transformer with lesion-aware evidence modeling.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the expert-level performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models for various medical imaging tasks, real-world performance failures with disparate outputs for various subgroups limit the usefulness of AI in improving patients' lives. Many definitions of fairness have been proposed, with discussions of various tensions that arise in the choice of an appropriate metric to use to evaluate bias; for example, should one aim for individual or group fairness? One central observation is that AI models apply "shortcut learning" whereby spurious features (such as chest tubes and portable radiographic markers on intensive care unit chest radiography) on medical images are used for prediction instead of identifying true pathology. Moreover, AI has been shown to have a remarkable ability to detect protected attributes of age, sex, and race, while the same models demonstrate bias against historically underserved subgroups of age, sex, and race in disease diagnosis. Therefore, an AI model may take shortcut predictions from these correlations and subsequently generate an outcome that is biased toward certain subgroups even when protected attributes are not explicitly used as inputs into the model. As a result, these subgroups became nonprivileged subgroups. In this review, the authors discuss the various types of bias from shortcut learning that may occur at different phases of AI model development, including data bias, modeling bias, and inference bias. The authors thereafter summarize various tool kits that can be used to evaluate and mitigate bias and note that these have largely been applied to nonmedical domains and require more evaluation for medical AI. The authors then summarize current techniques for mitigating bias from preprocessing (data-centric solutions) and during model development (computational solutions) and postprocessing (recalibration of learning). Ongoing legal changes where the use of a biased model will be penalized highlight the necessity of understanding, detecting, and mitigating biases from shortcut learning and will require diverse research teams looking at the whole AI pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.