Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37506264›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2024

Drug Resistance Assessed in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial of Maribavir Therapy for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplant Recipients.

Sunwen Chou, Sophie Alain, Carlos Cervera, Roy F Chemaly, Camille N Kotton, Jens Lundgren, Genovefa A Papanicolaou, Marcus R Pereira, Jingyang J Wu, Rose Ann Murray and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02931539 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Maribavir Treatment Compared to Investigator-assigned Treatment in Transplant Recipients With Cytomegalovirus), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02931539 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Maribavir Treatment Compared to Investigator-assigned Treatment in Transplant Recipients With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infections That Are Refractory or Resistant to Treatment With Ganciclovir, Valganciclovir, Foscarnet, or Cidofovir

TypeinterventionalSponsorShireRan2016 to 2020Enrolled352ConditionsCytomegalovirus (CMV)ArmsMaribavir, Ganciclovir, Valganciclovir, Foscarnet, Cidofovir
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Innovative diagnostics and treatments of infections in transplantation," report from the 2025Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Current and Future Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infections in Transplantation.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Sunwen ChouDivision of Infectious Diseases, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Sophie AlainDepartment of Virology and National Reference Center for Herpesviruses, Limoges University Hospital, UMR Inserm 1092, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9787-1421
Carlos CerveraDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Roy F ChemalyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Camille N KottonTransplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jens LundgrenCentre for Health and Infectious Disease Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalitet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8901-7850
Genovefa A PapanicolaouInfectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Marcus R PereiraDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jingyang J WuTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
Rose Ann MurrayTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
Neil E BussMedical Expressions, Büren, Solothurn, Switzerland.
Martha FournierTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
Takeda (United States) · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USHarvard University · USInserm · FRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Genetic Pathways of Human Cytomegalovirus Drug ResistanceR01AI116635 · NIAID · PORTLAND VA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Sunwen Chou · 2015 to 2026
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116635NIH HHS R01-AI116635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis drug resistance analysis of a randomized trial includes 234 patients receiving maribavir and 116 receiving investigator-assigned standard therapy (IAT), where 56% and 24%, respectively, cleared cytomegalovirus DNA at week 8 (treatment responders).

methodsBaseline and posttreatment plasma samples were tested for mutations conferring drug resistance in viral genes UL97, UL54, and UL27.

resultsAt baseline, genotypic testing revealed resistance to ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir in 56% of patients receiving maribavir and 68% receiving IAT, including 9 newly phenotyped mutations. Among them, 63% (maribavir) and 21% (IAT) were treatment responders. Detected baseline maribavir resistance mutations were UL27 L193F (n = 1) and UL97 F342Y (n = 3). Posttreatment, emergent maribavir resistance mutations were detected in 60 (26%) of those randomized to maribavir, including 49 (48%) of 103 nonresponders and 25 (86%) of the 29 nonresponders where viral DNA initially cleared then rebounded while on maribavir. The most common maribavir resistance mutations were UL97 T409M (n = 34), H411Y (n = 26), and C480F (n = 21), first detected 26 to 130 (median 56) days after starting maribavir.

conclusionsBaseline maribavir resistance was rare. Drug resistance to standard cytomegalovirus antivirals did not preclude treatment response to maribavir. Rebound in plasma cytomegalovirus DNA while on maribavir strongly suggests emerging drug resistance. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02931539.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsDichlororibofuranosylbenzimidazoleRibonucleosidesAntiviral AgentsBenzimidazolesCytomegalovirusDNADrug Resistance, ViralGanciclovirHumansMutationPhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)Transplant RecipientsAntiviral AgentsBenzimidazolesDichlororibofuranosylbenzimidazoleDNAGanciclovirmaribavirPhosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor)Ribonucleosidesantiviral drug resistanceantiviral therapycytomegalovirusmaribavir

Identifiers

PMID37506264
PMCPMC10873177
OpenAlexW4385335333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.