ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2023
Survey of Premium Versus Large Manufactured Cigars Use in U.S. Consumers.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regulatory Research Advances on Premium Cigars.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAn Internet questionnaire was used to determine smoking behavior, purchasing behavior, and risk perceptions among exclusive or nearly exclusive current users of either large manufactured (LMC) or premium cigars (PC). AIMS AND
methodsRespondents (n = 250) were recruited from a nationally representative market research panel. An a priori designation of PC users was adapted from criteria in published literature and the recent National Academy of Science report.
resultsExamination of responses revealed a (n = 19) disagreement between cigar users' self-classifications and the a priori classification. After eliminating ineligible respondents 188 participants were classified as PC (n = 92; 55 male) or LMC (n = 96; 49 male) users. There were no significant differences in age or gender between groups. Respondents were all over 21 years old. The largest age groups were 30-39 years and 60-69 years. PC users were significantly more likely to have higher annual incomes and to buy cigars online or through tobacco specialty shops, whereas LMC users purchased from convenience stores. Most participants had used other combustible tobacco products (88%) but few had used ENDS (24%) or oral tobacco (7.5%). There was no significant difference in the frequency of smoke inhalation or perceptions of risk for health. There was marked uncertainty in self-characterization of cigar type; our sample had higher female representation than expected (n = 84, 45%), and inhalation was frequently endorsed in both groups (52%, overall).
conclusionsThe results support the need for standardized classifications and suggest current trends may indicate shifts in gender and use behavior but provide no evidence supporting less restrictive regulation of PC. IMPLICATIONS: An Internet questionnaire was used to determine smoking behavior, purchasing behavior, and risk perceptions among current users of LMC or PC. There was uncertainty about cigar classification even in this sample of regular users. Our results demonstrated more than expected inhalation of cigar smoke, considerable use by females, and under appreciation of health risks. No results supported less restrictive regulations for premium cigars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.