ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
Mechanisms of sensorimotor adaptation in a hierarchical state feedback control model of speech.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasible cognition requires latent state.Biological cybernetics · 2026Article
- Speech sensorimotor adaptation in young adult cochlear implant users with early implantation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Modeling framework disentangles cerebellar mechanisms in speech feedback control, revealing trade-offs reshaped by degeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Audiomotor prediction errors drive speech adaptation even in the absence of overt movement.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Active inference and speech motor control.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Auditory-motor adaptation and de-adaptation for speech depend more on time in the new environment than on the amount of practice.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- An Integrated Approach to Concurrently Measure Corrective and Adaptive Responses to Auditory Errors.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Neurophysiological Evidence of Sensory Prediction Errors Driving Speech Sensorimotor Adaptation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Does pre-speech auditory modulation reflect processes related to feedback monitoring or speech movement planning?Neuroscience letters · 2024Article
- Sensorimotor adaptation to a nonuniform formant perturbation generalizes to untrained vowels.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Bayesian inference of state feedback control parameters for fo perturbation responses in cerebellar ataxia.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Does pre-speech auditory modulation reflect processes related to feedback monitoring or speech movement planning?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Upon perceiving sensory errors during movements, the human sensorimotor system updates future movements to compensate for the errors, a phenomenon called sensorimotor adaptation. One component of this adaptation is thought to be driven by sensory prediction errors-discrepancies between predicted and actual sensory feedback. However, the mechanisms by which prediction errors drive adaptation remain unclear. Here, auditory prediction error-based mechanisms involved in speech auditory-motor adaptation were examined via the feedback aware control of tasks in speech (FACTS) model. Consistent with theoretical perspectives in both non-speech and speech motor control, the hierarchical architecture of FACTS relies on both the higher-level task (vocal tract constrictions) as well as lower-level articulatory state representations. Importantly, FACTS also computes sensory prediction errors as a part of its state feedback control mechanism, a well-established framework in the field of motor control. We explored potential adaptation mechanisms and found that adaptive behavior was present only when prediction errors updated the articulatory-to-task state transformation. In contrast, designs in which prediction errors updated forward sensory prediction models alone did not generate adaptation. Thus, FACTS demonstrated that 1) prediction errors can drive adaptation through task-level updates, and 2) adaptation is likely driven by updates to task-level control rather than (only) to forward predictive models. Additionally, simulating adaptation with FACTS generated a number of important hypotheses regarding previously reported phenomena such as identifying the source(s) of incomplete adaptation and driving factor(s) for changes in the second formant frequency during adaptation to the first formant perturbation. The proposed model design paves the way for a hierarchical state feedback control framework to be examined in the context of sensorimotor adaptation in both speech and non-speech effector systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.