Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37505914›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2023

Interplay of TP53 allelic state, blast count, and complex karyotype on survival of patients with AML and MDS.

Anna Stengel, Manja Meggendorfer, Wencke Walter, Constance Baer, Niroshan Nadarajah, Stephan Hutter, Wolfgang Kern, Torsten Haferlach, Claudia Haferlach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Molecular and Clinical Insights intoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna StengelMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany.
Manja MeggendorferMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany.
Wencke WalterMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-9838
Constance BaerMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany.
Niroshan NadarajahMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany.
Stephan HutterMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2432-8898
Wolfgang KernMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany.
Torsten HaferlachMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany.
Claudia HaferlachMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany.
Munich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several clinical and genetic factors impact overall survival (OS) in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including complex karyotype (CK), TP53 allelic state, and blast count. We analyzed the interplay of these factors by performing Cox regression analysis and by determining the frequency of TP53 single-hit (sh) and double-hit (dh) events and OS in MDS (n = 747) with <5% blasts, with ≥5% but <10% blasts, and ≥10% but <20% blasts and AML (n = 772). MDS with <5% blasts showed the best outcome, followed by with ≥5% but <10% blasts, and ≥10% but <20% blasts, and AML (median OS: 75, 54, 27, and 18 months, respectively). The same hierarchy was observed when each subgroup was divided into TP53sh, TP53dh, and without TP53 alterations (alt), revealing a dismal outcome of TP53dh in all subgroups (17, 10, 8, and 1 month[s], respectively). MDS with <5% blasts differed from the other subgroups by showing predominantly TP53sh (76% of TP53alt cases), and by an independent adverse impact of CK on OS (hazard ratio, 5.2; P < .001). The remaining subgroups displayed many similarities, with TP53dh found at high frequencies (67%, 91%, and 71%, respectively) and only TP53alt but not CK independently influencing OS, and TP53dh showing the strongest influence. When the total cohort was split based on TP53 state, only the blast count and not CK had an independent adverse impact on OS in all subgroups. Thus, TP53dh is the strongest prognostic factor, further supporting its integration into risk stratification guidelines and classification as a separate entity. However, the blast count also influences OS independent of TP53 state, whereas CK plays a minor prognostic role.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMyelodysplastic SyndromesAbnormal KaryotypeBlood Cell CountHumansPrognosisTumor Suppressor Protein p53TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID37505914
PMCPMC10515307
OpenAlexW4385341436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.