Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37505795›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Results and Methodological Implications of the Digital Epidemiology of Prescription Drug References Among Twitter Users: Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Analyses.

Maria A Parker, Danny Valdez, Varun K Rao, Katherine S Eddens, Jon Agley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria A ParkerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9763-1129
Danny ValdezDepartment of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2355-9881
Varun K RaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-7704-1974
Katherine S EddensDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7783-4156
Jon AgleyDepartment of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2345-8850
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media is an important information source for a growing subset of the population and can likely be leveraged to provide insight into the evolving drug overdose epidemic. Twitter can provide valuable insight into trends, colloquial information available to potential users, and how networks and interactivity might influence what people are exposed to and how they engage in communication around drug use.

objectiveThis exploratory study was designed to investigate the ways in which unsupervised machine learning analyses using natural language processing could identify coherent themes for tweets containing substance names.

methodsThis study involved harnessing data from Twitter, including large-scale collection of brand name (N=262,607) and street name (N=204,068) prescription drug-related tweets and use of unsupervised machine learning analyses (ie, natural language processing) of collected data with data visualization to identify pertinent tweet themes. Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) with coherence score calculations was performed to compare brand (eg, OxyContin) and street (eg, oxys) name tweets.

resultsWe found people discussed drug use differently depending on whether a brand name or street name was used. Brand name categories often contained political talking points (eg, border, crime, and political handling of ongoing drug mitigation strategies). In contrast, categories containing street names occasionally referenced drug misuse, though multiple social uses for a term (eg, Sonata) muddled topic clarity.

conclusionsContent in the brand name corpus reflected discussion about the drug itself and less often reflected personal use. However, content in the street name corpus was notably more diverse and resisted simple LDA categorization. We speculate this may reflect effective use of slang terminology to clandestinely discuss drug-related activity. If so, straightforward analyses of digital drug-related communication may be more difficult than previously assumed. This work has the potential to be used for surveillance and detection of harmful drug use information. It also might be used for appropriate education and dissemination of information to persons engaged in drug use content on Twitter.

Indexed as

Prescription DrugsSocial MediaSubstance-Related DisordersData CollectionData MiningHumansMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingUnsupervised Machine LearningPrescription Drugsdata miningdigital epidemiologydrugdrug useepidemiologicalepidemiologyLDAmachine learningnatural language processingNLPpharmaceuticpharmaceuticalpharmaceuticalspharmacyprescriptionsocial mediatext miningtweettweetsTwitterunsupervised analysis

Identifiers

PMID37505795
PMCPMC10422173
OpenAlexW4385329960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.