Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37505763›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023

The MAGE A1-A10 Expression associated with Histopathological Findings of Malignant or Non-Malignant Cells in Peripheral Lung Tumors.

Gondo Mastutik, Alphania Rahniayu, Isnin Anang Marhana, Nila Kurniassari, Anny Setijo Rahaju, Mochamad Amin, Heru Fajar Trianto, - Atika

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gondo MastutikDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-1681-0222
Alphania RahniayuDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5059-7875
Isnin Anang MarhanaDepartment of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-4627-0511
Nila KurniassariDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-5584-2705
Anny Setijo RahajuDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-8392-3350
Mochamad AminInstitute of Tropical Disease, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-7005-5267
Heru Fajar TriantoDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-0078
- AtikaDepartment of Public Health Sciences-Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-8319-4135
Airlangga University · IDTanjungpura University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective was to evaluate the expression of melanoma antigen (MAGE) A from A1 to 10 (A1-10) and the individual MAGE A family in the peripheral lung tumors and to analyze its association with histopathological findings.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 67 samples of peripheral lung tumor obtained by core biopsies from patients with clinical diagnoses such as lung and mediastinal tumors. The specimens were divided into two, one to perform histopathological diagnosis and the last for mRNA MAGE A examination. A Nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using universal primer, MF10/MR10 and MF10/MR12. The collected data were analyzed by appropriate statistical techniques.

resultThe histopathological finding showed 41 (61.2 %) of specimens as malignant cells and 26 (38.8 %) of specimens as non-malignant cells. MAGE A1-10 was expressed at 47 (70.1 %) and MAGE A1-6 was expressed at 25 (37.3 %) of specimens. In a malignant cell, MAGE A1-10 and MAGE A1-6 were expressed at 33 (80.5 %) and 19 (46.3 %), respectively. In non-malignant cells, MAGE A1-10 and MAGE A1-6 were expressed at 14 (53.9 %) and 6 (23.1 %,) respectively. The MAGE A1-10 and MAGE A8 expressions were significantly associated with histopathological findings of malignant or non-malignant cells. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of MAGE A1-10 were 80.5 %, 46.2 %, and 67.2 %, respectively; while for MAGE A8 were 41.5 %, 88.5 %, and 59.7 %, respectively.

conclusionThe MAGE A1-10 expression was the most commonly detected and associated with the histopathological finding. Moreover, it was more sensitive and specific and had higher diagnostic accuracy than others. Therefore, the MAGE A1-10 assay may improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of malignancy in peripheral lung tumors.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmLung NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMelanoma-Specific AntigensAntigens, NeoplasmMelanoma-Specific Antigenscancer cellcore biopsyLung cancerMAGE A1-10MAGE A1-6

Identifiers

PMID37505763
PMCPMC10676496
OpenAlexW4385330427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.