Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37505744›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2023

Ambient Air Pollution and Risk of Enterotomy, Gastrointestinal Cancer, and All-Cause Mortality among 4,708 Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Jie Chen, Lintao Dan, Yuhao Sun, Shuai Yuan, Weilin Liu, Xuejie Chen, Fangyuan Jiang, Tian Fu, Han Zhang, Minzi Deng and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of Pollution on Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Focus on Air Pollution.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jie ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Lintao DanDepartment of Big Data in Health Science, Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yuhao SunDepartment of Big Data in Health Science, Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Shuai YuanDepartment of Big Data in Health Science, Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Weilin LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xuejie ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Fangyuan JiangDepartment of Big Data in Health Science, Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Tian FuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Han ZhangDepartment of Big Data in Health Science, Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Minzi DengDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaoyan WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7281-1078
Xue LiDepartment of Big Data in Health Science, Center of Clinical Big Data and Analytics of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Central South University · CNZhejiang University · CNKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies indicated that air pollution plausibly increases the risk of adverse outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) via proinflammatory mechanisms. However, there is scant epidemiological data and insufficient prospective evidence assessing associations between ambient air pollution and clinical outcomes of IBD.

objectivesWe aimed to investigate the associations between ambient air pollution and clinical outcomes among individuals with IBD.

methodsLeveraging data from the UK Biobank, we included 4,708 individuals with IBD recruited in the period 2006-2010 in this study. A land use regression model was used to assess annual mean concentrations of ambient air pollutants nitrogen including oxides (

resultsDuring a mean follow-up of 12.0 y, 265 enterotomy events, 124 incident gastrointestinal cancer, and 420 death events were documented among individuals with IBD. We found that each interquartile range (IQR) increase in exposure to

conclusionsAmbient pollution exposure was associated with an increased risk of enterotomy and all-cause mortality among individuals with IBD, highlighting the important role of environmental health in improving the prognosis of IBD. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12215.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionGastrointestinal NeoplasmsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesEnvironmental ExposureHumansNitrogen DioxideParticulate MatterProspective StudiesAir PollutantsNitrogen DioxideParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID37505744
PMCPMC10379095
OpenAlexW4385329972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.