Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37505699›Full record

ArticleToxins2023

Dynamics and Molecular Interactions of GPI-Anchored CD59.

Tomas B Voisin, Emma C Couves, Edward W Tate, Doryen Bubeck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomas B VoisinDepartment of Life Sciences, Sir Ernst Chain Building, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Emma C CouvesDepartment of Life Sciences, Sir Ernst Chain Building, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Edward W TateDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, UK.
Doryen BubeckDepartment of Life Sciences, Sir Ernst Chain Building, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011178/1Cancer Research UK C24523/A26234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD59 is a GPI-anchored cell surface receptor that serves as a gatekeeper to controlling pore formation. It is the only membrane-bound inhibitor of the complement membrane attack complex (MAC), an immune pore that can damage human cells. While CD59 blocks MAC pores, the receptor is co-opted by bacterial pore-forming proteins to target human cells. Recent structures of CD59 in complexes with binding partners showed dramatic differences in the orientation of its ectodomain relative to the membrane. Here, we show how GPI-anchored CD59 can satisfy this diversity in binding modes. We present a PyLipID analysis of coarse-grain molecular dynamics simulations of a CD59-inhibited MAC to reveal residues of complement proteins (C6:Y285, C6:R407 C6:K412, C7:F224, C8β:F202, C8β:K326) that likely interact with lipids. Using modules of the MDAnalysis package to investigate atomistic simulations of GPI-anchored CD59, we discover properties of CD59 that encode the flexibility necessary to bind both complement proteins and bacterial virulence factors.

Indexed as

Complement Membrane Attack ComplexComplement System ProteinsBacteriaCD59 AntigensHumansCD59 AntigensCD59 protein, humanComplement Membrane Attack ComplexComplement System ProteinsCDCcholesterol-dependent cytolysinscomplementGPI anchorMACPFmembrane attack complexpore-forming protein

Identifiers

PMID37505699
PMCPMC10467114
OpenAlexW4382982445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.