Article in Toxics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Denis Moledo de Souza AbessaSão Paulo State University-UNESP, Coastal Campus, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, São Vicente 11380-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4609-1668
Letícia França AlbanitSão Paulo State University-UNESP, Coastal Campus, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, São Vicente 11380-900, SP, Brazil.
Pedro Henrique Paixão de MouraSão Paulo State University-UNESP, Coastal Campus, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, São Vicente 11380-900, SP, Brazil.
Vitória Soares NogueiraSão Paulo State University-UNESP, Coastal Campus, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, São Vicente 11380-900, SP, Brazil.
Felipe Teixeira SantanaSão Paulo State University-UNESP, Coastal Campus, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, São Vicente 11380-900, SP, Brazil.
Kainã FagundesSão Paulo State University-UNESP, Coastal Campus, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, São Vicente 11380-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0793-8216
Maysa UedaSão Paulo State University-UNESP, Coastal Campus, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, São Vicente 11380-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9867-4844
Otto Patrão de Oliveira MullerCentral de Equipamentos Multidisciplinar (CEM), Universidade Federal do ABC UFABC; São Bernardo do Campo 09850-910, SP, Brazil.
Caio Cesar-RibeiroSão Paulo State University-UNESP, Coastal Campus, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, São Vicente 11380-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4418-0624
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 308533/2018-6; PIBIC 6215; PIBIC 5675São Paulo Research Foundation 2020/03004-0; 2018/25498-5; 2022/09070-0; 2022/06164-4; 2022/01542-0; 2020/09300-0São Paulo State University COPE CONECTA program
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Glitter particles are considered a model of microplastics, which are used in a wide range of products. In this study, we evaluated the toxicity of two types of glitter (green and white, with distinct chemical compositions) dispersions on the embryonic development of the sea urchins
Indexed as
chronic toxicitycontaminants of emerging concernecotoxicologymarine pollutionmicroplastics
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
A Glow before Darkness: Toxicity of Glitter Particles to Marine Invertebrates. · full record | OpenQuestion