Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37505353›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Does Preoperative MRI Reduce Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery?

Ashley Cairns, Anees B Chagpar, Elisabeth Dupont, Edward A Levine, Jennifer S Gass, Akiko Chiba, David W Ollila, Marissa Howard-McNatt, SHAVE2 Group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley CairnsDivision of Surgical Oncology Service, Department of Surgery Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center BLVD, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Anees B ChagparYale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Elisabeth DupontWatson Clinic, Lakeland, FL, USA.
Edward A LevineDivision of Surgical Oncology Service, Department of Surgery Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center BLVD, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Jennifer S GassWomen and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Akiko ChibaDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
David W OllilaUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Marissa Howard-McNattDivision of Surgical Oncology Service, Department of Surgery Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center BLVD, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. mmcnatt@wakehealth.edu.
SHAVE2 Group
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWake Forest University · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USDuke Medical Center · USProvidence College · USWatson Clinic · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a mainstay for breast cancer management, and obtaining negative margins is critical. Some have advocated for the use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reducing positive margins after BCS. We sought to determine whether preoperative MRI was associated with reduced positive margins. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe SHAVE/SHAVE2 trials were multicenter trials in ten US centers with patients with stage 0-3 breast cancer undergoing BCS. Use of preoperative MRI was at the discretion of the surgeon. We evaluated whether or not preoperative MRI was associated with margin status prior to randomization regarding resection of cavity with shave margins.

resultsA total of 631 patients participated. Median age was 64 (range 29-94) years, with a median tumor size of 1.3 cm (range 0.1-9.3 cm). Patient factors included 26.1% of patients (165) had palpable tumors, and 6.5% (41) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor factors were notable for invasive lobular histology in 7.0% (44) and extensive intraductal component (EIC) in 32.8% (207). A preoperative MRI was performed in 193 (30.6%) patients. Those who underwent preoperative MRI were less likely to have a positive margin (31.1% versus 38.8%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.073). On multivariate analysis, controlling for patient and tumor factors, utilization of preoperative MRI was not a significant factor in predicting margin status (p = 0.110). Rather, age (p = 0.032) and tumor size (p = 0.040) were the only factors associated with margin status.

conclusionThese data suggest that preoperative MRI is not associated margin status; rather, patient age and tumor size are the associated factors.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID37505353
OpenAlexW4385329994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.