Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37505350›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

The Importance of Awaiting Biopsy Results in Solitary Pathological Proximal Femoral Fractures : Do We Need to Biopsy Solitary Pathological Fractures?

Floortje G M Verspoor, Gerjon Hannink, Michael Parry, Lee Jeys, Jonathan D Stevenson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Floortje G M VerspoorDepartment of Oncology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK. F.G.Verspoor@Amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-5888
Gerjon HanninkDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9526-3775
Michael ParryDepartment of Oncology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0845-9257
Lee JeysDepartment of Oncology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Jonathan D StevensonDepartment of Oncology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2869-6455
Aston University · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal surgical treatment for patients presenting with (impending and complete) pathological proximal femoral fractures is predicated on prognosis. Guidelines recommend a preoperative biopsy to exclude sarcomas, however no evidence confirms a benefit.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the diagnostic accuracy, morbidity and sarcoma incidence of biopsy results in these patients. MATERIAL AND

methodsAll patients (n = 153) presenting with pathological proximal femoral fractures between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients after inadvertent surgery (n = 25) were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the accuracy and morbidity of diagnostic biopsies.

resultsOf 112/128 patients who underwent biopsy, nine (8%) biopsies were unreliable either due to being inconclusive (n = 5) or because the diagnosis changed after resection (n = 4). Of impending fractures, 32% fractured following needle core biopsy. Median time from diagnosis to surgery was 30 days (interquartile range 21-46). The overall biopsy positive predictive value (PPV) to differentiate between sarcoma and non-sarcoma was 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.00). In patients with a previous malignancy (n = 24), biopsy (n = 23) identified the diagnosis in 83% (PPV 0.91, 95% CI 0.71-0.99), of whom five (24%) patients had a new diagnosis. In patients without a history of cancer (n = 61), final diagnosis included carcinomas (n = 24, 39.3%), sarcomas (n = 24, 39.3%), or hematological malignancies (n = 13, 21.3%). Biopsy (n = 58) correctly identified the diagnosis in 66% of patients (PPV 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.90).

conclusionThis study confirms the importance of a preoperative biopsy in solitary pathological proximal femoral fractures due to the risk of sarcoma in patients with and without a history of cancer. However, biopsy delays the time to definite surgery, results can be inconclusive or false, and it risks completion of impending fractures.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsFemoral FracturesFractures, SpontaneousSarcomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProximal Femoral FracturesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37505350
PMCPMC10562502
OpenAlexW4385331057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.