Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37505347›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2023

Co-designing psychosis simulated patient scenarios with mental health stakeholders for pharmacy curricula.

Tina X Ung, Claire L O'Reilly, Rebekah J Moles, Sarira El-Den

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tina X UngSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy and Bank Building A15, Science Rd, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. tina.xu@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5532-975X
Claire L O'ReillySchool of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy and Bank Building A15, Science Rd, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6416-8150
Rebekah J MolesSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy and Bank Building A15, Science Rd, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4043-6728
Sarira El-DenSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy and Bank Building A15, Science Rd, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7500-3351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacists need knowledge and confidence to support people living with mental illness. Evidence-based educational materials for pharmacy students to provide psychosis care is limited.

aimTo co-design, content validate and pilot-test, with mental health stakeholders, simulated patient scenarios to educate and assess students in providing psychosis care.

methodMental health consumers were invited to co-design three simulated patient scenarios (first-episode psychosis, carer of someone living with schizophrenia, non-adherence to antipsychotics), guided by published and psychometrically-tested materials. A panel of mental health stakeholders participated in two rounds of content validation (RAND/UCLA appropriateness model). Round 1 involved individual survey completion to calculate item content validity index (I-CVI) for relevance/clarity, content validity ratio for essentiality and overall scale content validity index (S-CVI/Ave and S-CVI/UA) scores for each scenario. Scores analyses and feedback comments informed revisions. Round 2 involved a panel meeting to discuss revisions and finalise content. The scenarios were then pilot-tested with pharmacy students.

resultsTwo consumers participated in co-design, nine stakeholders in content validation. All items showed excellent content validity for relevance/clarity. Eleven items were revised for essentiality, discussed, then re-rated at the panel meeting for consensus. The scenarios were pilot-tested with pharmacy students (n = 15) and reported to be realistic and relevant to future practice, contributing to students' confidence in supporting people experiencing mental health symptoms or crises.

conclusionPartnering with mental health stakeholders has enabled co-design of authentic, content valid educational materials for pharmacy students to provide psychosis care, in preparation for future provision of mental health support.

Indexed as

PharmacyPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaStudents, PharmacyCurriculumHumansMental HealthCo-designContent validationMental health educationPharmacyPsychosisSimulation

Identifiers

PMID37505347
PMCPMC10600032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.