Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37505268›Full record

ReviewPediatric cardiology2023

Fetal Pulmonary Venous Return: From Basic Research to the Clinical Value of Doppler Assessment.

J Portela Dias, L Guedes-Martins

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multimodality Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection: Single-Center Practice Variability and a Systematic Review of Diagnostic Error.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Portela DiasInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal. jipd91@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3960-9182
L Guedes-MartinsInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0491-0752
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fetal pulmonary circulation represents less than 25% of the fetal cardiac output. In comparison with the pulmonary arteries, studies on pulmonary veins are few and limited, and many questions remain to be answered. The literature reports that pulmonary veins play an important role in regulating vascular flow, forming an active segment of the pulmonary circulation. The development of more sophisticated ultrasonography technology has allowed the investigation of the extraparenchymal pulmonary veins and their waveform. The recognition of the pulmonary vein anatomy in echocardiography is important for the diagnosis of anomalous pulmonary venous connections, with a significant impact on prognosis. On the other hand, the identification of the normal pulmonary vein waveform seems to be a reliable way to study left heart function, with potential applicability in fetal and maternal pathology. Thus, the goal of this narrative review was to provide a clinically oriented perspective of the available literature on this topic.

Indexed as

Pulmonary VeinsEchocardiographyFemaleFetusHumansPregnancyUltrasonography, DopplerUltrasonography, PrenatalAnatomyDopplerFetal echocardiographyFetal heartFetal pulmonary venous returnPhysiology

Identifiers

PMID37505268
PMCPMC10435640
OpenAlexW4385330172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.