ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Information extraction from weakly structured radiological reports with natural language queries.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Transparent, Reproducible Text-Based Phenotyping of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration from 500 Consecutive MRI Reports, with a Pre-Specified Image Analysis Framework.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A framework for extraction of clinical information from radiological mammography reports using large language models and retrieval augmented generation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Natural Language Processing-Based Triage of Superficial Soft Tissue Ultrasound Reports in Orthopedic Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Trends and Trajectories in the Rise of Large Language Models in Radiology: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Question Answering for Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review of Datasets and Models.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- A scoping review of large language model based approaches for information extraction from radiology reports.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- The policies on the use of large language models in radiological journals are lacking: a meta-research study.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Advancing medical imaging with language models: featuring a spotlight on ChatGPT.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesProvide physicians and researchers an efficient way to extract information from weakly structured radiology reports with natural language processing (NLP) machine learning models.
methodsWe evaluate seven different German bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) models on a dataset of 857,783 unlabeled radiology reports and an annotated reading comprehension dataset in the format of SQuAD 2.0 based on 1223 additional reports.
resultsContinued pre-training of a BERT model on the radiology dataset and a medical online encyclopedia resulted in the most accurate model with an F1-score of 83.97% and an exact match score of 71.63% for answerable questions and 96.01% accuracy in detecting unanswerable questions. Fine-tuning a non-medical model without further pre-training led to the lowest-performing model. The final model proved stable against variation in the formulations of questions and in dealing with questions on topics excluded from the training set.
conclusionsGeneral domain BERT models further pre-trained on radiological data achieve high accuracy in answering questions on radiology reports. We propose to integrate our approach into the workflow of medical practitioners and researchers to extract information from radiology reports. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: By reducing the need for manual searches of radiology reports, radiologists' resources are freed up, which indirectly benefits patients. KEY POINTS: • BERT models pre-trained on general domain datasets and radiology reports achieve high accuracy (83.97% F1-score) on question-answering for radiology reports. • The best performing model achieves an F1-score of 83.97% for answerable questions and 96.01% accuracy for questions without an answer. • Additional radiology-specific pretraining of all investigated BERT models improves their performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.