Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37505252›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Information extraction from weakly structured radiological reports with natural language queries.

Amin Dada, Tim Leon Ufer, Moon Kim, Max Hasin, Nicola Spieker, Michael Forsting, Felix Nensa, Jan Egger, Jens Kleesiek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amin Dada *Institute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany. amin.dada@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-7799
Tim Leon Ufer *Institute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Moon KimInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Max HasinInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Nicola SpiekerDr. Krüger MVZ GmbH, Bocholt, Germany.
Michael ForstingInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Felix NensaInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Jan EggerInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Jens KleesiekInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesProvide physicians and researchers an efficient way to extract information from weakly structured radiology reports with natural language processing (NLP) machine learning models.

methodsWe evaluate seven different German bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) models on a dataset of 857,783 unlabeled radiology reports and an annotated reading comprehension dataset in the format of SQuAD 2.0 based on 1223 additional reports.

resultsContinued pre-training of a BERT model on the radiology dataset and a medical online encyclopedia resulted in the most accurate model with an F1-score of 83.97% and an exact match score of 71.63% for answerable questions and 96.01% accuracy in detecting unanswerable questions. Fine-tuning a non-medical model without further pre-training led to the lowest-performing model. The final model proved stable against variation in the formulations of questions and in dealing with questions on topics excluded from the training set.

conclusionsGeneral domain BERT models further pre-trained on radiological data achieve high accuracy in answering questions on radiology reports. We propose to integrate our approach into the workflow of medical practitioners and researchers to extract information from radiology reports. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: By reducing the need for manual searches of radiology reports, radiologists' resources are freed up, which indirectly benefits patients. KEY POINTS: • BERT models pre-trained on general domain datasets and radiology reports achieve high accuracy (83.97% F1-score) on question-answering for radiology reports. • The best performing model achieves an F1-score of 83.97% for answerable questions and 96.01% accuracy for questions without an answer. • Additional radiology-specific pretraining of all investigated BERT models improves their performance.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalRadiologyHumansLanguageMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingInformation extractionMachine learningNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID37505252
PMCPMC10791738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.