Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37505250›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Establishing national diagnostic reference levels in radiography, mammography, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry services in Ireland and comparing these with European diagnostic reference levels.

Lee O'Hora, Noelle Neville, John Tuffy, Agnella Craig, Kirsten O'Brien, Kay Sugrue, Maeve McGarry, Brendan Duggan, Sean Egan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lee O'HoraThe Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland. radiationprotection@hiqa.ie.
Noelle NevilleThe Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland.
John TuffyThe Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland.
Agnella CraigThe Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland.
Kirsten O'BrienThe Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland.
Kay SugrueThe Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland.
Maeve McGarryThe Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland.
Brendan DugganThe Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland.
Sean EganThe Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Dublin, Ireland.
Health and Safety Authority · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this work was to establish national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Ireland and compare these to existing European DRLs where available. This work surveyed all radiological facilities providing radiography, mammography, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) services in Ireland.

methodsA list of common procedures and clinical tasks was established. A national database of service providers was used to identify the appropriate medical radiological facilities providing these services. These facilities were issued with an online survey. National DRLs were set as the 75th percentile of the distribution of median values obtained. A national median dose was also established. The broad categorisation of equipment type was also considered. Where differences between DRLs established using different detector types were deemed statistically significant, equipment-specific national DRLs were established.

resultsNational DRLs were established for 12 adult radiography projections. Equipment-specific (computed radiography and digital radiography) adult DRLs were established for four radiography projections. Paediatric DRLs were established for 11 radiography projections, including two based on clinical indications, for a range of paediatric weight categories. National DRLs were established for unilateral two-view mammography and breast tomosynthesis as well as for four DXA clinical indications and projections. All but one Irish DRL figure was found to be below or equal to European data.

conclusionsThis work provided a unique opportunity to establish national DRLs based on census data for a range of procedures and clinical tasks across radiography, mammography and DXA and compare these with European levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This work established national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) based on census data for a range of procedures and clinical tasks across radiography, mammography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The establishment of national DRLs is an essential component in the optimisation of patient radiation dose. KEY POINTS: • Diagnostic reference levels are easily measured quantities intended for use as an aid to optimise patient dose and to identify when levels of patient dose are unusually high. • Data from all medical radiological facilities in Ireland was obtained to establish national diagnostic reference level (DRL) values and national median dose values in radiography, x-ray breast imaging and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning and these were compared to existing European DRLs where available. • National DRL values were established for the first time in breast tomosynthesis, DXA scanning, and paediatric radiography.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Reference LevelsMammographyAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultChildHumansIrelandRadiation DosageRadiographyReference ValuesAbsorptiometry, photonDiagnostic Reference LevelsMammographyRadiography

Identifiers

PMID37505250
OpenAlexW4385331331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.