ArticleMembranes2023
Preparation of Cross-Sectional Membrane Samples for Scanning Electron Microscopy Characterizations Using a New Frozen Section Technique.
Article in Membranes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliable characterization of polymer electrolytes for next-generation energy storage: misinterpretations, challenges, and methodological solutions.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Compensating thickness effects in micro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy using integrated optical microscopy for thickness determination of soft matter block copolymer membranes.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Determining Accurate Pore Structures of Polypropylene Membrane for ECMO Using FE-SEM Under Optimized Conditions.Membranes · 2025Article
- Characterization of anisotropic pore structure and dense selective layer of capillary membranes for long-term ECMO by cross-sectional ion-milling method.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025Article
- A coating machine for coating filaments with bioactive nanomaterials for extrusion 3D printing.Heliyon · 2024Article
- 3D porous structure imaging of membranes for medical devices using scanning probe microscopy and electron microscopy: from membrane science points of view.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterization of the cross-sectional morphologies of polymeric membranes are critical in understanding the relationship of structure and membrane separation performances. However, preparation of cross-sectional samples with flat surfaces for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) characterizations is challenging due to the toughness of the non-woven fabric support. In this work, a new frozen section technique was developed to prepare the cross-sectional membrane samples. A special mold was self-designed to embed membranes orientationally. The frozen section parameters, including the embedding medium, cryostat working temperature, and sectioning thickness were optimized. The SEM characterizations demonstrated that the frozen section technique, using ultrapure water as the embedding medium at a working temperature of -30 °C and a sectioning thickness of 0.5 µm, was efficient for the preparation of the membrane samples. Three methods of preparation for the cross-sectional polymeric membranes, including the conventional liquid nitrogen cryogenic fracture, the broad ion beam (BIB) polishing, and the frozen section technique were compared, which showed that the modified frozen section method was efficient and low cost. This developed method could not only accelerate the development of membrane technology but also has great potential for applications in preparation of other solid samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.