Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37504969›Full record

SynthesisBJS open2023

Prophylactic mesh augmentation after laparotomy for elective and emergency surgery: meta-analysis.

Simone Frassini, Francesca Calabretto, Stefano Granieri, Paola Fugazzola, Matteo Massaro, Benedetta Sargenti, Luca Schiavone, Simone Zanghì, Francesca Dal Mas, Luca Ansaloni and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Variable use of modern abdominal wall closure techniques at emergency laparotomy - an international, cross-sectional survey of surgical practice.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Simone FrassiniGeneral Surgery Residency, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1043-7401
Francesca CalabrettoGeneral Surgery Residency, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Stefano GranieriGeneral Surgery Unit, ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Vimercate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9167-3400
Paola FugazzolaGeneral Surgery Residency, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-9276
Matteo MassaroGeneral Surgery Residency, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Benedetta SargentiGeneral Surgery Residency, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Luca SchiavoneGeneral Surgery Residency, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Simone ZanghìGeneral Surgery Residency, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Francesca Dal MasDepartment of Management, Università Ca' Foscari, Venezia, Italy.
Luca AnsaloniGeneral Surgery Residency, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Lorenzo CobianchiGeneral Surgery Residency, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · ITAzienda Ospedaliera di Desio e Vimercate · ITCa' Foscari University of Venice · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncisional hernia is a common short- and long-term complication of laparotomy and can lead to significant morbidity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an up-to-date overview of the laparotomy closure method in elective and emergency settings with the prophylactic mesh augmentation technique.

methodsThe Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were screened without time restrictions up to 21 June 2022 using the keywords 'laparotomy closure', 'mesh', 'mesh positioning', and 'prophylactic mesh', and including medical subject headings terms. Only RCTs reporting the incidence of incisional hernia and other wound complications after elective or emergency midline laparotomy, where patients were treated with prophylactic mesh augmentation or without mesh positioning, were included. The primary endpoint was to explore the risk of incisional hernia at different follow-up time points. The secondary endpoint was the risk of wound complications. The risk of bias for individual studies was assessed according to the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for randomized trials.

resultsEighteen RCTs, including 2659 patients, were retrieved. A reduction in the risk of incisional hernia at every time point was highlighted in the prophylactic mesh augmentation group (1 year, risk ratio 0.31, P = 0.0011; 2 years, risk ratio 0.44, P < 0.0001; 3 years, risk ratio 0.38, P = 0.0026; 4 years, risk ratio 0.38, P = 0.0257). An increased risk of wound complications was highlighted for patients undergoing mesh augmentation, although this was not significant.

conclusionsMidline laparotomy closure with prophylactic mesh augmentation can be considered safe and effective in reducing the incidence of incisional hernia. Further trials are needed to identify the ideal type of mesh and technique for mesh positioning, but surgeons should consider prophylactic mesh augmentation to decrease incisional hernia rate, especially in high-risk patients for fascial dehiscence and even in emergency settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID: CRD42022336242 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/record_email.php).

Indexed as

Abdominal Wound Closure TechniquesIncisional HerniaHumansIncidenceLaparotomySurgical Mesh

Identifiers

PMID37504969
PMCPMC10375944
OpenAlexW4385331388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.