ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023
Cone Photoreceptor Morphology in Choroideremia Assessed Using Non-Confocal Split-Detection Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopy.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vivo Human Cone Photoreceptor Inner Segment Diameter Database Using Adaptive Optics Retinal Imaging.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Cone Contrast and Entropy of Adaptive Optics Images in Choroideremia.Current eye research · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Assessment of Cone Structure, Choriocapillaris, and Retinal Sensitivity in Choroideremia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- The Cone Optoretinogram as a Function of Retinal Eccentricity.Photonics · 2025Article
- Retinal Sensitivity in Comparison to Cone Density in Choroideremia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Parafoveal cone function in choroideremia assessed with adaptive optics optoretinography.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- FOVEAL PHENOTYPES IN CHOROIDEREMIA ON ADAPTIVE OPTICS SCANNING LIGHT OPHTHALMOSCOPY.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Choroideremia (CHM) is an X-linked inherited retinal degeneration causing loss of the photoreceptors, retinal pigment epithelium, and choriocapillaris, although patients typically retain a central island of relatively preserved, functioning retina until late-stage disease. Here, we investigate cone photoreceptor morphology within the retained retinal island by examining cone inner segment area, density, circularity, and intercone space. Methods: Using a custom-built, multimodal adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope, nonconfocal split-detection images of the photoreceptor mosaic were collected at 1°, 2°, and 4° temporal to the fovea from 13 CHM and 12 control subjects. Cone centers were manually identified, and cone borders were segmented. A custom MATLAB script was used to extract area and circularity for each cone and calculate the percentage of intercone space in each region of interest. Bound cone density was also calculated. An unbalanced two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to assess statistical differences between the CHM and control groups and along retinal eccentricity. Results: Cone density was lower in the CHM group than in the control group (P < 0.001) and decreased with eccentricity from the fovea (P < 0.001). CHM cone inner segments were larger in area (P < 0.001) and more circular (P = 0.042) than those of the controls. Intercone space in CHM was also higher than in the controls (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Cone morphology is altered in CHM compared to control, even within the centrally retained, functioning retinal area. Further studies are required to determine whether such morphology is a precursor to cone degeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.