Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37504583›Full record

ArticleInsects2023

Promoting Beneficial Arthropods in Urban Agroecosystems: Focus on Flowers, Maybe Not Native Plants.

Stacy M Philpott, Azucena Lucatero, Sofie Andrade, Cameron Hernandez, Peter Bichier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacy M PhilpottEnvironmental Studies Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8338-3806
Azucena LucateroEnvironmental Studies Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Sofie AndradeEcology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Cameron HernandezEnvironmental Studies Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Peter BichierEnvironmental Studies Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
University of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

UCMEXUS-CONACYT Collaborative Grant NAUC Santa Cruz Committee on Research NAUC Santa Cruz Institute of International Studies NAUnited States Department of Agriculture 2016-67019-25185United States Department of Agriculture 2016-67032-24987United States Department of Agriculture 2019-38413-29026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Urbanization threatens biodiversity, yet urban native plants support native biodiversity, contributing to conservation and ecosystem services. Within urban agroecosystems, where non-native plants are abundant, native plants may boost the abundance and richness of beneficial arthropods. Nevertheless, current information focuses on pollinators, with little attention being paid to other beneficials, like natural enemies. (2) We examined how the species richness of native plants, garden management, and landscape composition influence the abundance and species richness of all, native, and non-native bees, ladybeetles, ants, and ground-foraging spiders in urban agroecosystems (i.e., urban community gardens) in California. (3) We found that native plants (~10% of species, but only ~2.5% of plant cover) had little influence on arthropods, with negative effects only on non-native spider richness, likely due to the low plant cover provided by native plants. Garden size boosted native and non-native bee abundance and richness and non-native spider richness; floral abundance boosted non-native spider abundance and native and non-native spider richness; and mulch cover and tree and shrub abundance boosted non-native spider richness. Natural habitat cover promoted non-native bee and native ant abundance, but fewer native ladybeetle species were observed. (4) While native plant richness may not strongly influence the abundance and richness of beneficial arthropods, other garden management features could be manipulated to promote the conservation of native organisms or ecosystem services provided by native and non-native organisms within urban agroecosystems.

Indexed as

antsbeesbiodiversitygardeninvasive speciesladybeetlesnative speciesspidersurbanization

Identifiers

PMID37504583
PMCPMC10380228
OpenAlexW4382141277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.