Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37504323›Full record

GuidelineCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline.

Derek Muradali, Glenn G Fletcher, Erin Cordeiro, Samantha Fienberg, Ralph George, Supriya Kulkarni, Jean M Seely, Rola Shaheen, Andrea Eisen

Open access · goldAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer management: current applications, limitations, and future directions.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  5. The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2025: Meeting Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Derek MuradaliDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1W7, Canada.
Glenn G FletcherProgram in Evidence-Based Care, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0676-7416
Erin CordeiroDepartment of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Samantha FienbergOntario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON M5G 2L3, Canada.
Ralph GeorgeDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada.
Supriya KulkarniDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1W7, Canada.
Jean M SeelyDepartment of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0367-2219
Rola ShaheenDepartment of Radiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Andrea EisenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CACancer Care Ontario · CAMcMaster University · CAQueen's University · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after the diagnosis of breast cancer by mammography and/or ultrasound is inconsistent.

methodsAfter conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing preoperative breast MRI versus no MRI, we reconvened to prepare a clinical practice guideline on this topic.

resultsBased on the evidence that MRI improved recurrence, decreased the rates of reoperations (re-excisions or conversion mastectomy), and increased detection of synchronous contralateral breast cancer, we recommend that preoperative breast MRI should be considered on a case-by-case basis in patients diagnosed with breast cancer for whom additional information about disease extent could influence treatment. Based on stronger evidence, preoperative breast MRI is recommended in patients diagnosed with invasive lobular carcinoma for whom additional information about disease extent could influence treatment. For both recommendations, the decision to proceed with MRI would be conditional on shared decision-making between care providers and the patient, taking into account the benefits and risks of MRI as well as patient preferences. Based on the opinion of the Working Group, preoperative breast MRI is also recommended in the following more specific situations: (a) to aid in surgical planning of breast conserving surgery in patients with suspected or known multicentric or multifocal disease; (b) to identify additional lesions in patients with dense breasts; (c) to determine the presence of pectoralis major muscle/chest wall invasion in patients with posteriorly located tumours or when invasion of the pectoralis major muscle or chest wall is suspected; (d) to aid in surgical planning for skin/nipple-sparing mastectomies, autologous reconstruction, oncoplastic surgery, and breast conserving surgery with suspected nipple/areolar involvement; and (e) in patients with familial/hereditary breast cancer but who have not had recent breast MRI as part of screening or diagnosis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMastectomyMeta-Analysis as TopicOntarioSystematic Reviews as Topicbreast cancermagnetic resonance imagingpractice guideline

Identifiers

PMID37504323
PMCPMC10378361
OpenAlexW4382984043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.