Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37504314›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Capecitabine Plus Aromatase Inhibitor as First Line Therapy for Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Alberto Alvarado-Miranda, Fernando Ulises Lara-Medina, Wendy R Muñoz-Montaño, Juan W Zinser-Sierra, Paula Anel Cabrera Galeana, Cynthia Villarreal Garza, Daniel Sanchez Benitez, Jesús Alberto Limón Rodríguez, Claudia Haydee Arce Salinas, Alberto Guijosa and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto Alvarado-MirandaBreast Tumors Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Fernando Ulises Lara-MedinaBreast Tumors Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Wendy R Muñoz-MontañoBreast Tumors Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2269-2354
Juan W Zinser-SierraGastrointestinal Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Paula Anel Cabrera GaleanaBreast Tumors Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Cynthia Villarreal GarzaBreast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnológico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza García 66278, Mexico.
Daniel Sanchez BenitezBreast Tumors Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Jesús Alberto Limón RodríguezGrupo Opción Oncología, Monterrey 64060, Mexico.
Claudia Haydee Arce SalinasBreast Tumors Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Alberto GuijosaSchool of Medicine, Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City 03920, Mexico.
Oscar ArrietaThoracic Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1164-3779
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXHospital Zambrano Hellion · MXTecnológico de Monterrey · MXUniversidad Panamericana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: recent evidence suggests that long low-dose capecitabine regimens have a synergistic effect with endocrine therapy as aromatase inhibitors (AIs), and might increase overall survival for hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer compared to both treatments. We performed a retrospective study to confirm the efficacy and expand the safety data for capecitabine plus AI (a combination henceforth named XELIA) for this indication. (2) We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 163 hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who received either the XELIA regimen, capecitabine, or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as single agents in first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival, best objective response, and toxicity incidence. (3) Results: the median progression-free survival for patients receiving XELIA, AI, and capecitabine was 29.37 months (20.91 to 37.84; 95% CI), 20.04 months (7.29 to 32.80; 95% CI) and 10.48 (8.69 to 12.28; 95% CI), respectively. The overall response rate was higher in the XELIA group (29.5%) than in the AI (14.3%) and capecitabine (9.1%) groups. However, the differences in overall survival were not statistically significant. Apart from hand-foot syndrome, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse events between the groups. (4) Conclusions: this retrospective study suggests that progression-free survival and overall response rates improved with the XELIA regimen compared to use of aromatase inhibitors and capecitabine alone. Combined use demonstrated an adequate safety profile and might represent an advantageous treatment in places where CDK 4/6 is not available. Larger studies and randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the effects shown in our study.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAromatase InhibitorsCapecitabineErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesAromatase InhibitorsCapecitabineErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesaromatase inhibitorcapecitabinecombined therapymetastatic breast cancermetronomic chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37504314
PMCPMC10377785
OpenAlexW4382023148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.