Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37504309›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Nature-Based Virtual Reality Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot for Caregiver Respite.

Mohammed Owayrif Alanazi, Arienne Patano, Gary Bente, Andrew Mason, Dawn Goldstein, Sina Parsnejad, Gwen Wyatt, Rebecca Lehto

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07567391 (Virtual Reality Nature Therapy for Palliative Patients and Caregivers in Saudi Arabia), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07567391 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Reality Nature Therapy for Palliative Patients and Caregivers in Saudi Arabia: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Support Quality of Life and Cultural Adaptation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BishaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsVirtual Reality, Quality of Life, Palliative Care, CaregiversArmsImmersive Nature VR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammed Owayrif AlanaziCollege of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1698-2892
Arienne PatanoCollege of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-0740-4717
Gary BenteCollege of Communication Arts & Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Andrew MasonCollege of Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Dawn GoldsteinCollege of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Sina ParsnejadTexas Instruments, 1001 Winstead Dr #305, Cary, NC 27513, USA.
Gwen WyattCollege of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1608-8505
Rebecca LehtoCollege of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5091-8408
Michigan State University · USTexas Instruments (United States) · USUniversity of Bisha · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home-based informal caregivers (CGs), such as the family members and friends of cancer patients, often suffer averse emotional symptoms, such as anxiety and depression, due to the burden associated with providing care. The natural environment has been valued as a healing sanctuary for easing emotional pain, promoting calmness, relaxation, and restoration. The use of virtual reality (VR) nature experiences offers an alternative option to CGs to manage emotional symptoms and improve their quality of life. The aim of this mixed-method pilot was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a nature-based VR experience for home-based CGs. Nine informal CGs participated in a 10 min nature-based VR session and completed feasibility, acceptability, and VR symptom measures in the laboratory. Semi-structured interviews with five of the CGs provided qualitative data regarding their experiences with VR. The CGs (mean age 64.78 years) were mostly female (n = 7). Our analysis showed high feasibility (15.11 ± 1.76; range 0-16) and acceptability (15.44 ± 1.33; range 0-16), as well as low VR Symptoms (1.56 ± 1.33; range 0-27). Participants primarily expressed positive perceptions regarding VR feasibility and acceptability during interviews. Our findings show promise for the use of VR nature experiences. In the next phase of the study, the intervention will be tested on home-based informal CGs of patients at end of life.

Indexed as

CaregiversVirtual RealityAffectFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Lifeacceptabilitycaregiver supportfeasibilitymixed methodsnature virtual reality

Identifiers

PMID37504309
PMCPMC10378650
OpenAlexW4381805401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.