Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37504300›Full record

ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2023

Exosome Analysis in Prostate Cancer: How They Can Improve Biomarkers' Performance.

Stefano Salciccia, Marco Frisenda, Giulio Bevilacqua, Luca Gobbi, Bruno Bucca, Martina Moriconi, Pietro Viscuso, Alessandro Gentilucci, Gianna Mariotti, Susanna Cattarino and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Exosomes: a promising avenue for cancer diagnosis beyond treatment.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Stefano SalcicciaDepartment Materno Infantile Scienze Urologiche, University Sapienza, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4873-3257
Marco FrisendaDepartment Materno Infantile Scienze Urologiche, University Sapienza, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8225-1174
Giulio BevilacquaDepartment Materno Infantile Scienze Urologiche, University Sapienza, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Luca GobbiDepartment Materno Infantile Scienze Urologiche, University Sapienza, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Bruno BuccaDepartment Materno Infantile Scienze Urologiche, University Sapienza, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Martina MoriconiDepartment Materno Infantile Scienze Urologiche, University Sapienza, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Pietro ViscusoDepartment Materno Infantile Scienze Urologiche, University Sapienza, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro GentilucciDepartment Materno Infantile Scienze Urologiche, University Sapienza, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Gianna MariottiDepartment Materno Infantile Scienze Urologiche, University Sapienza, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Susanna CattarinoDepartment Materno Infantile Scienze Urologiche, University Sapienza, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Flavio ForteFigliesancamillo Hospital, 00198 Rome, Italy.
Stefano FaisIstituto Superiore di Sanita, Viale Regina Elena, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Mariantonia LogozziIstituto Superiore di Sanita, Viale Regina Elena, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Beatrice SciarraDepartment of Chemistry, University Sapienza, Viale Universita, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro SciarraDepartment Materno Infantile Scienze Urologiche, University Sapienza, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7899-8056

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exosomes are extracellular nanovesicles (EV), that is, carriers of different biomolecules such as lipids, proteins, nucleic acids. Their composition and the fact that their release dramatically increases in cases of tumorigenesis open up different scenarios on their possible application to research into new biomarkers. The first purpose of the present review was to specifically analyze and compare different methodologies available for the use of exosomes in prostate cancer (PC). The most widely applied methodologies include ultracentrifugation techniques, size-based techniques, immunoaffinity capture-based techniques (mainly ELISA), and precipitation. To optimize the acquisition of exosomes from the reference sample, more techniques can be applied in sequence for a single extraction, thereby determining an increase in labor time and costs. The second purpose was to describe clinical results obtained with the analysis of PSA-expressing exosomes in PC; this provides an incredibly accurate method of discriminating between healthy patients and those with prostate disease. Specifically, the IC-ELISA alone method achieved 98.57% sensitivity and 80.28% specificity in discriminating prostate cancer (PC) from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). An immunocapture-based ELISA assay was performed to quantify and characterize carbonic anhydrase (CA) IX expression in exosomes. The results revealed that CA IX positive exosomes were 25-fold higher in plasma samples from PC patients than in those from healthy controls. The analysis of PC-linked exosomes represents a promising diagnostic model that can effectively distinguish patients with PC from those with non-malignant prostatic disease. However, the use of exosome analysis in clinical practice is currently limited by several issues, including a lack of standardization in the analytical process and high costs, which are still too high for large-scale use.

Indexed as

biomarkerexosomeprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID37504300
PMCPMC10378661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.