Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37504127›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2023

Characterizing the Impedance Properties of Dry E-Textile Electrodes Based on Contact Force and Perspiration.

Vignesh Ravichandran, Izabela Ciesielska-Wrobel, Md Abdullah Al Rumon, Dhaval Solanki, Kunal Mankodiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Performance comparison of conductive textile electrodes in ECG monitoring.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating Dry Electrodes and Bioinstrumentation for Wearable Arm ECG Acquisition.2024 International Conference on the Challenges, Opportunities, Innovations and Applications in Electronic Textiles · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vignesh RavichandranDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5083-1900
Izabela Ciesielska-WrobelDepartment of Textiles, Fashion Merchandising and Design, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3919-7395
Md Abdullah Al RumonDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4413-7896
Dhaval SolankiDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
Kunal MankodiyaDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6423-0823

Funding

National Science Foundation 2139724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biopotential electrodes play an integral role within smart wearables and clothing in capturing vital signals like electrocardiogram (ECG), electromyogram (EMG), and electroencephalogram (EEG). This study focuses on dry e-textile electrodes (E1-E6) and a laser-cut knit electrode (E7), to assess their impedance characteristics under varying contact forces and moisture conditions. Synthetic perspiration was applied using a moisture management tester and impedance was measured before and after exposure, followed by a 24 h controlled drying period. Concurrently, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the dry electrode was evaluated during ECG data collection on a healthy participant. Our findings revealed that, prior to moisture exposure, the impedance of electrodes E7, E5, and E2 was below 200 ohm, dropping to below 120 ohm post-exposure. Embroidered electrodes E6 and E4 exhibited an over 25% decrease in mean impedance after moisture exposure, indicating the impact of stitch design and moisture on impedance. Following the controlled drying, certain electrodes (E1, E2, E3, and E4) experienced an over 30% increase in mean impedance. Overall, knit electrode E7, and embroidered electrodes E2 and E6, demonstrated superior performance in terms of impedance, moisture retention, and ECG signal quality, revealing promising avenues for future biopotential electrode designs.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyTextilesElectric ImpedanceElectrodesHumansbiopotential electrodesbiosignalselectrode impedance characterizatione-textile electrodessmart textilestechnical embroidery

Identifiers

PMID37504127
PMCPMC10377293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.