Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37504032›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Review of Studies Supporting Metaphorical Embodiment.

Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Danyal Farsani, Jiehui Hu, Zahra Eskandari, Yanjiao Zhu, Hassan Banaruee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omid Khatin-ZadehSchool of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5294-9777
Danyal FarsaniDepartment of Teacher Education, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Jiehui HuSchool of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China.
Zahra EskandariDepartment of English, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar 99717-56499, Iran.
Yanjiao ZhuSchool of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China.
Hassan BanarueeDepartment of English, American, and Celtic Studies, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8004-7604

Funding

Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a review of studies that have provided evidence supporting metaphorical embodiment. These studies are divided into three categories of behavioral, neuroimaging, and corpus studies. After summing up the findings of these studies, it is concluded that metaphorical embodiment is supported by these three lines of research. This is followed by a review of a number of studies that have measured sensorimotor and action effector strengths of various concepts. Then, the idea of sensorimotor and action effector strength of concepts is linked to metaphorical embodiment to present the main idea of the paper. Based on the findings of studies that have measured sensorimotor and action effector strengths of concepts, it is suggested that the degree of involvement of sensorimotor systems in mental simulation of metaphoric actions may not be at the same level in all metaphors. It depends on the sensorimotor strength of the base of the metaphor in various modalities. If the base of a metaphor has a high degree of perceptual strength in a certain modality, that modality plays the most important role in the processing of that metaphor, while other modalities take less important roles. In other words, depending on the sensorimotor strengths of the base of a metaphor in various modalities, those modalities have various levels of importance in the processing of that metaphor. If the base of the metaphor is weak in all modalities, modal resources can come into play to process that metaphor.

Indexed as

metaphorical embodimentsensorimotor strengthsensorimotor systemssimulation

Identifiers

PMID37504032
PMCPMC10376178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.