Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37503961›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Multiparametric ultrasound imaging for early-stage steatosis: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging-based proton density fat fraction.

Jihye Baek, Lokesh Basavarajappa, Ryan Margolis, Leroy Arthur, Junjie Li, Kenneth Hoyt, Kevin J Parker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jihye BaekDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Lokesh BasavarajappaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Ryan MargolisDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Leroy ArthurDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Junjie LiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Kenneth HoytDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Kevin J ParkerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Multiparametric ultrasound imaging for early detection of nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseR01DK126833 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI HOYT, KENNETH · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
The H-scan approach to classifying ultrasound echoesR21EB025290 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PARKER, KEVIN J · 2018 to 2019
$420k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB025290NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK126833NIH HHS R01DK126833NIH HHS R21EB025290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of liver diseases, especially steatosis, requires a more convenient and noninvasive tool for liver diagnosis, which can be a surrogate for the gold standard biopsy. Magnetic resonance (MR) measurement offers potential, however ultrasound (US) has better accessibility than MR. PURPOSE: This study aims to suggest a multiparametric US approach which demonstrates better quantification and imaging performance than MR imaging-based proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) for hepatic steatosis assessment.

methodsWe investigated early-stage steatosis to evaluate our approach. An in vivo (within the living) animal study was performed. Fat inclusions were accumulated in the animal livers by feeding a methionine and choline deficient (MCD) diet for 2 weeks. The animals (n = 19) underwent US and MR imaging, and then their livers were excised for histological staining. From the US, MR, and histology images, fat accumulation levels were measured and compared: multiple US parameters; MRI-PDFF; histology fat percentages. Seven individual US parameters were extracted using B-mode measurement, Burr distribution estimation, attenuation estimation, H-scan analysis, and shear wave elastography. Feature selection was performed, and the selected US features were combined, providing quantification of fat accumulation. The combined parameter was used for visualizing the localized probability of fat accumulation level in the liver; This procedure is known as disease-specific imaging (DSI).

resultsThe combined US parameter can sensitively assess fat accumulation levels, which is highly correlated with histology fat percentage (R = 0.93, p-value < 0.05) and outperforms the correlation between MRI-PDFF and histology (R = 0.89, p-value < 0.05). Although the seven individual US parameters showed lower correlation with histology compared to MRI-PDFF, the multiparametric analysis enabled US to outperform MR. Furthermore, this approach allowed DSI to detect and display gradual increases in fat accumulation. From the imaging output, we measured the color-highlighted area representing fatty tissues, and the fat fraction obtained from DSI and histology showed strong agreement (R = 0.93, p-value < 0.05).

conclusionsWe demonstrated that fat quantification utilizing a combination of multiple US parameters achieved higher performance than MRI-PDFF; therefore, our multiparametric analysis successfully combined selected features for hepatic steatosis characterization. We anticipate clinical use of our proposed multiparametric US analysis, which could be beneficial in assessing steatosis in humans.

Indexed as

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseHumansLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingProtonsUltrasonographyProtonsfat quantificationH-scanmultiparametric analysissteatosistissue characterizationultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37503961
PMCPMC11238269
OpenAlexW4385330461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.