Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37503741›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2023

Pregnant women's perceptions of antenatal care and utilisation of digital health tools in Magu District, Tanzania: a qualitative study.

Sandra van Pelt, Marit van der Pijl, Robert A C Ruiter, Pendo M Ndaki, Rehema Kilimba, Laura Shields-Zeeman, John B F de Wit, Karlijn Massar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sandra van PeltResearcher, Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Correspondence: vanpelt.sandra@gmail.com.
Marit van der PijlResearcher, Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5291-5988
Robert A C RuiterProfessor of Health and Social Psychology, Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-3258
Pendo M NdakiResearcher; Lecturer, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Behavioral Sciences, Mwanza, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-2238-7627
Rehema KilimbaProject officer, Msichana Tai, a Project of Mikono Yetu, Mwanza Region, Tanzania.
Laura Shields-ZeemanProfessor of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Public Health; Chair of the Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Public Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0923-8771
John B F de WitProfessor of Population Mental Health, Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, International Public Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karlijn MassarAssociate Professor of Applied Social Psychology, Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antenatal care is essential to promote maternal health. Prior research has focused on barriers women face to attending antenatal care, and improving quality of care is seen as a precondition for better attendance. Digital health tools are seen as a promising instrument to increase the quality of healthcare. It is less clear to what extent the use of digital health tools in low- and middle-income counties would be perceived as beneficial by end-users. The aim of this research was to explore women's experiences with antenatal care, and whether digital health tools would change their perceptions of quality of care. This qualitative research utilised an interpretative phenomenological approach on data from semi-structured in-depth interviews collected in 2016 with 19 randomly selected pregnant women from six different dispensaries in Magu District. Findings showed that pregnant women are motivated to attend antenatal care and are grateful for the services received. However, they also articulated a need for improvements in antenatal care services such as the availability of diagnostic tests and more interactions with healthcare workers. Participants indicated that a digital health tool could help in storing patient files and improving communication with health workers. Our results indicate that pregnant women are positive about the use of digital health tools during antenatal care but that the implementation of such a tool should be implemented in parallel to structural service delivery improvements, such as testing availability.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeoplePrenatal CareFemaleHumansMaternal HealthPregnancyQualitative ResearchTanzaniaelectronic clinical decision and support systemmaternal healthpregnant womenprenatal carequality of care

Identifiers

PMID37503741
PMCPMC10388793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.