ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2023
Predictive coding and stochastic resonance as fundamental principles of auditory phantom perception.
Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Altered parietal multisensory integration in chronic tinnitus during closed-loop real-time fMRI auditory downregulation.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Trial
- Migraine impairs the auditory protective mechanism: a potential biomarker.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Illuminating the black box of reservoir computing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Unified Theory for the Development of Tinnitus Perception and Hyperacusis Based on Associative Plasticity in the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Prediction, syntax and semantic grounding in the brain and large language models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Structural and dynamical strategies to prevent runaway excitation in reservoir computing.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Mid-infrared photons relieve tinnitus-like behavior of mice by regulating HCN2 ion channels in the medial geniculate body.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- [Tinnitus-current developments : Overview and summary of current state of knowledge in 2024].HNO · 2025Review
- Phase II Clinical Study on Low-Intensity-Noise Tinnitus Suppression (LINTS) for Tinnitus Treatment.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Abnormally enhanced temporal correlations of alpha oscillations across multiple timescales in tinnitus patients.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Musical Hallucinosis: Auditory Illusions After Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2025Review
- A Single Dose of AC102 Reverts Tinnitus by Restoring Ribbon Synapses in Noise-Exposed Mongolian Gerbils.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- What Do Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Responses Tell Us About Tinnitus?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence based advancements in nanomedicine for brain disorder management: an updated narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Correlation of non-auditory comorbidities and hearing loss in chronic subjective tinnitus patients: a retrospective database study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Combining the unequal variance signal detection model with the health belief model to optimize shared decision making in tinnitus patients: part 2-patient profiling.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Transcriptional profile changes caused by noise-induced tinnitus in the cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus of the rat.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Astrocytes and Tinnitus.Brain sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanistic insight is achieved only when experiments are employed to test formal or computational models. Furthermore, in analogy to lesion studies, phantom perception may serve as a vehicle to understand the fundamental processing principles underlying healthy auditory perception. With a special focus on tinnitus-as the prime example of auditory phantom perception-we review recent work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, psychology and neuroscience. In particular, we discuss why everyone with tinnitus suffers from (at least hidden) hearing loss, but not everyone with hearing loss suffers from tinnitus. We argue that intrinsic neural noise is generated and amplified along the auditory pathway as a compensatory mechanism to restore normal hearing based on adaptive stochastic resonance. The neural noise increase can then be misinterpreted as auditory input and perceived as tinnitus. This mechanism can be formalized in the Bayesian brain framework, where the percept (posterior) assimilates a prior prediction (brain's expectations) and likelihood (bottom-up neural signal). A higher mean and lower variance (i.e. enhanced precision) of the likelihood shifts the posterior, evincing a misinterpretation of sensory evidence, which may be further confounded by plastic changes in the brain that underwrite prior predictions. Hence, two fundamental processing principles provide the most explanatory power for the emergence of auditory phantom perceptions: predictive coding as a top-down and adaptive stochastic resonance as a complementary bottom-up mechanism. We conclude that both principles also play a crucial role in healthy auditory perception. Finally, in the context of neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence, both processing principles may serve to improve contemporary machine learning techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.