ArticleThoracic research and practice2023
Effect of 2 Different High-Dose Methylprednisolone Treatments on Clinical Outcomes in Severe COVID-19 Patients.
Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe present study aimed to evaluate and compare the use of 2 different high-dose methylprednisolone posology in treating severe coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia regarding mortality and recovery time between themselves and against steroidal/ non-steroidal treatment. MATERIAL AND
methodsSevere coronavirus disease 2019 patients followed up between March 2020 and January 2021 were included. The steroid-free treatment protocol was applied before August 2020 (non-pulse group) and a treatment algorithm containing normal and high doses of methylprednisolone was applied after August 2020 (pulse group). Patients with clinical deterioration under the normal dose of methylprednisolone were administered 250 mg or 1000 mg of methylprednisolone for 3 days. We compared the pulse and non-pulse groups, in addition to pulse subgroups with each other, for clinical outcomes.
resultsA total of 138 patients were included, including 36 patients in the non-pulse group and 102 in the pulse group. In the pulse group, 70 patients received 1000 mg/day and 32 received 250 mg/day of high-dose methylprednisolone therapy. In the comparison of pulse and non-pulse patient groups, mortality rate was lower in the pulse group (P < .001), and the time to discharge without oxygen support was shorter. Although the patients in the 250 mg subgroup were older, there was no difference between the 250 mg and 1000 mg subgroups in terms of end of oxygen requirement, discharge with oxygen support, and mortality. In addition, the required time to reach the oxygen-free period in patients discharged without oxygen support was similar in the 2 subgroups, and the majority of patients in both subgroups reached the oxygen-free period on the 20th day after initiating methylprednisolone.
conclusionSince there was no difference in clinical improvement between the use of 250 mg or 1000 mg methylprednisolone in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 infection, 1000 mg methylprednisolone was not required.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.