Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37503596›Full record

ArticleThoracic research and practice2023

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Frequency After CoronaVac Vaccine: Ascovid Study.

Burcu Öztürk Şahin, Şennur Özen, Oya Baydar Toprak, Nurdan Köktürk, Mehmet Tevfik Kitapçı

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Burcu Öztürk ŞahinDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Şennur ÖzenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Delta Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Oya Baydar ToprakDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Çukurova University, Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Nurdan KöktürkDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet Tevfik KitapçıDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Integra Medical Imaging Center, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIt is accepted that the only way to end severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 epidemic is through community vaccination. The frequency and clinical features of infection after vaccination are not known clearly. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency and clinical features of coronavirus disease 2019 seen after either the first or second dose of CoronaVac vaccination in healthcare workers and their relatives. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis is a cross-sectional retrospective survey study. The study was carried out in 2013 volunteers, including 1903 (94.5%) healthcare workers and 110 (5.5%) relatives of healthcare workers. The frequency and clinical features of coronavirus disease 2019 before and after the first or second dose of CoronaVac vaccination were retrospectively evaluated using an online questionnaire conducted in July 2021.

resultsA total of 2013 people, 1312 women and 701 men, participated in the study. Of these individuals, 245 (12.1%) were polymerase chain reaction positive for coronavirus disease 2019 before vaccination. Of this group, 185 (75.5% of polymerase chain reaction positives and 9.1% of the whole population) received home-based therapy, while 38 (15.5%) received hospital admission. Asymptomatic polymerase chain reaction positivity before vaccination was seen in 22 (9%) individuals. There were 177 (8.8%) participants who developed polymerase chain reaction positivity at any time after vaccination. In 129 (72.8%) of these participants, polymerase chain reaction positivity occurred 21 days after the second dose of vaccine. While the number of patients hospitalized before vaccination was 38 (15.5% of the polymerase chain reaction positivity group and 1.89% of the general population), the number of patients hospitalized after the vaccination was 17 (10.1% of the polymerase chain reaction positivity group and 0.80% of the general population). The decrease in hospitalization proportion was statistically significant (P = .002).

conclusionThe frequency of coronavirus disease 2019, severe illness, and hospitalization rates were found to be lower in postvaccination period. The vaccine is effective in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 and severe disease.

Identifiers

PMID37503596
PMCPMC10765179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.