Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37503523›Full record

ArticleCanadian liver journal2023

Public reimbursement policies in Canada for direct-acting antiviral treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: A descriptive study.

Gaelen Snell, Alison D Marshall, Jennifer van Gennip, Matthew Bonn, Janet Butler-McPhee, Curtis L Cooper, Nadine Kronfli, Sarah Williams, Julie Bruneau, Jordan J Feld and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian liver journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gaelen SnellFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Alison D MarshallThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jennifer van GennipAction Hepatitis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew BonnCanadian Association of People Who Use Drugs, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Janet Butler-McPheeHIV Legal Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Curtis L CooperFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Nadine KronfliDivision of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Sarah WilliamsCalgary Liver Unit, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Julie BruneauCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Research Center, Quebec, Canada.
Jordan J FeldToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Naveed Z JanjuaBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Marina KleinDivision of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Nance CunninghamFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jason GrebelyThe Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sofia R BartlettBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies have simplified HCV treatment, and publicly funded Canadian drug plans have eliminated disease-stage restrictions for reimbursement of DAA therapies. However other policies which complicate, delay, or prevent treatment initiation still persist. We aim to describe these plans' existing reimbursement criteria and appraise whether they hinder treatment access. Methods: We reviewed DAA reimbursement policies of 16 publicly funded drug plans published online and provided by contacts with in-depth knowledge of prescribing criteria. Data were collected from May to July 2022. Primary outcomes were: (1) if plans have arranged to accept point-of-care HCV RNA testing for diagnosis; testing requirements for (2) HCV genotype, (3) fibrosis stage, and (4) chronic infection; (5) time taken and method used to approve reimbursement requests; (6) providers eligible to prescribe DAAs; and (7) restrictions on re-treatment. Results: Fifteen (94%) plans have at least one policy in place which limits simplified HCV treatment. Many plans continue to require results of genotype or fibrosis staging, limit eligible prescribers, and take longer than 1 day to approve coverage requests. One plan discourages treatment for re-infection. Conclusion: Reimbursement criteria set by publicly funded Canadian drug plans continue to limit timely, equitable access to HCV treatment. Eliminating clinically irrelevant pre-authorization testing, expanding eligible prescribers, expediting claims processing, and broadening coverage of treatment for reinfection will improve access to DAAs. The federal government could further enhance efforts by introducing a federal HCV elimination strategy or federal high-cost drug PharmaCare program.

Indexed as

direct-acting antiviralshepatitis C viruspolicy analysispublic drug planspublic health

Identifiers

PMID37503523
PMCPMC10370724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.