ReviewCureus2023
Clinical Impacts and Risk Factors for Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of educational interventions provided to patients with a central venous catheter and their informal caregivers: a systematic review.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Pooled it
- Transforming central line associated blood stream infection prevention in neonates: Results from a multimodal quality improvement initiative.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Article
- Central venous access device-associated complication costs in paediatric cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Observational
- Tackling Biofilm-Forming Pathogens: A Challenge to Overcome in the Fight Against Infectious Diseases.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Current and emerging therapies for fungal biofilms and systemic infections.Critical reviews in microbiology · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of the aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) and its modified version for early detection of central line-associated bloodstream infection: a pilot study using machine learning techniques.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2026Article
- Increased cost of care and length of stay due to potentially preventable catheter-related infections in US inpatient data, 2022-2023.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Article
- Impact of Internal Medicine Subspecialty Consultations on Length of Stay: A Pilot Retrospective Cohort Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- The Paradox of Healthcare in the 'Superbugs' Era: Current Challenges and Future Directions.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Health Disparities in Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: Analysis of the U.S. National Inpatient Sample Database (2016-2022).Infectious disease reports · 2025Article
- Epidemiology and Impact of Staff Training in Controlling Complications Related to Central Venous Catheters in 4 Intensive Care Units in a French University Hospital: Protocol of a Prospective, Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Electrochemical Catheter Hub Operated by a Wearable Micropotentiostat Prevents Acinetobacter baumannii Infection In Vitro.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Article
- Prevalence of central line-associated bloodstream infections in patients with cancer and subgroup analysis using propensity score matching: A nationwide multicenter study in Italy.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Article
- Incidence, Compliance, and Risk Factor Associated with Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients: A Multicenter Study in an Upper Middle-Income Country.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Identifying high-risk central lines in critically ill children: A novel nurse-driven screening and mitigation intervention to reduce CLABSI.American journal of infection control · 2025Article
- The 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Part 3, What About Using Stages of Sepsis in the Criteria?Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven prediction and interpretation of central line-associated bloodstream infections in ICU: insights from the MIMIC-IV database.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- Knowledge on CLABSI Prevention Strategies and Associated Factors Among ICU Nurses in Dar es Salaam.The East African health research journal · 2025Article
- Early detection of central line-associated bloodstream infection in intensive care unit patients using the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI).GMS hygiene and infection control · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background A central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is defined as a primary bloodstream infection (BSI) in a patient that had a central line within the 48-hour period before the development of the BSI and is not bloodstream-related to an infection at another site. CLABSI is a common healthcare-associated infection and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Methods This systematic review included studies published within the past 13 years that examined risk factors and clinical impact variables associated with CLABSI, using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria for defining catheter-associated infection, and included participants of all ages. The terms "CLABSI," "central line-associated bloodstream infection," "risk factors," "predictors," "morbidity," "mortality," "healthcare costs," and "length of hospital stay" were used to find relevant publications on PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. The quality assessment of the included publications utilized the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for observational studies. Results After the full-text screening, we identified 15 articles that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The majority of these studies were of good quality and had a low risk of bias based on our bias assessment. The studies included a total of 32,198 participants and covered a time period from 2010 to 2023. The mean age of the male patients included in the studies ranged from 0.1 months to 69.1 years. All of the included studies were either observational cohort studies, cross sectional studies, case-control studies, or case reports. The major study parameters/outcomes extracted were risk factors, CLABSI-associated mortality, hospital cost, length of hospital stay, and catheter days. With respect to predisposing factors, multilumen access catheters were identified as risk factors in three studies, use of more than one central venous catheter per case in four studies, hematologic malignancy in three studies, catheterization duration in four studies, surgical complexity in four studies, length of ICU stays in three studies, and parenteral nutrition in two studies. Conclusion The decision to place a venous device should be carefully considered by evaluating individual risk factors for the development of CLABSI. This is important due to the potential for severe clinical consequences and significant healthcare expenses associated with this complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.