Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37503495›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Simulation Training in a Lower Middle-Income Country: Supporting a New Center and Developing Low-Cost Models for Critical Skill Acquisition.

Eesha A Irfanullah, Abhishek Chandra, Rafat H Solaiman, Chesney Siems, Sadashivappa Chethan, Kumar Belani, James Harmon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The evolution of cardiothoracic surgery training: from apprenticeship to AI-assisted simulation.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eesha A IrfanullahDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, USA.
Abhishek ChandraDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, USA.
Rafat H SolaimanDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, USA.
Chesney SiemsDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, USA.
Sadashivappa ChethanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Narayana Health, Bengaluru, IND.
Kumar BelaniDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, USA.
James HarmonDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, USA.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USNarayana Health · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a demand for surgical simulation training to be made accessible in low-resource countries. We conducted a pilot workshop at a new state-of-the-art simulation center and evaluated two novel low-cost surgical simulation models in a lower middle-income country (LMIC).

methodsA hands-on workshop to train local educators about simulation training was held at a new simulation center. Participant surveys were analyzed following the "training-the-trainer" workshop. Low-cost, hybrid-fidelity pericardiocentesis and thoracic cavity simulation training models were created using locally available materials. These models recreated the pertinent anatomy at a cost under 20 US dollars each. The models were used to train 109 postgraduate anesthesiology trainees during two hands-on medical education workshops. Participant surveys were collected and analyzed.

resultsOf the local educators who participated in the "training-the-trainer" workshop, 65% "agreed" and 35% "strongly agreed" with the claim that the simulations better prepared the trainees to teach the clinical scenarios. Additionally, 65% of local educators "agreed" and 35% "strongly agreed" that the simulations prepared them to navigate interprofessional care in those scenarios. The low-cost pericardiocentesis simulation was ranked as "good" or "outstanding" by 100% of survey respondents. The low-cost thoracostomy simulation was ranked as "good" or "outstanding" by 64% of survey respondents. Both the pericardiocentesis and thoracostomy simulators were valued for their low-cost design, the recreation of essential anatomy, and immersive design elements.

conclusionOur team successfully implemented novel simulators for skill training in an LMIC by working in close collaboration with local experts, with the advancement of local simulation instruction practices. Collaboration is key to increasing access to surgical simulations, particularly in low- to middle-income countries.

Indexed as

general surgeryinternationalinternational collaborationlow-cost simulationlow-resource settingmedical educationpericardiocentesissimulationthoracostomytrauma

Identifiers

PMID37503495
PMCPMC10368800
OpenAlexW4382137872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.