Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37503177›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

The Impact of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation on Autonomic Regulation after Spinal Cord Injury: A randomized crossover trial.

Ryan Solinsky, Kathryn Burns, Christopher Tuthill, Jason W Hamner, J Andrew Taylor

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan SolinskySpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital.
Kathryn BurnsSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital.
Christopher TuthillSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital.
Jason W HamnerSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital.
J Andrew TaylorSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital.
Harvard University · USSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital · US

Funding

Techniques DevelopmentP2CHD086844 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI THOMPSON, AIKO · 2015 to 2024
$12.7M
Deciphering Preserved Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord InjuryK23HD102663 · NICHD · SPAULDING REHABILITATION HOSPITAL · PI SOLINSKY, RYAN · 2020 to 2024
$822k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD102663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) have significant autonomic nervous system dysfunction. However, despite recent findings postulated to support that spinal cord stimulation improves dynamic autonomic regulation, limited scope of previous testing means the true effects remain unknown. Objective: To determine whether transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation improves dynamic autonomic regulation after SCI. Design: Single-blinded, randomized crossover trial with matched cohorts. Setting: Academic autonomic physiology laboratory. Participants: Two pairs of well-matched individuals with and without high-thoracic, complete SCI. Interventions: Sub-motor threshold transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation delivered at T10-T11 using 120Hz, 30Hz, and 30Hz with 5kHz carrier frequency at separate autonomic testing sessions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Baseline autonomic regulation was characterized with tests of above injury level sympathoexcitation (Valsalva's maneuver), sympathoinhibition (progressive doses of bolus intravenous phenylephrine), and below level sympathoexcitation (foot cold pressor test). At three subsequent visits, this testing battery was repeated with the addition of spinal cord stimulation at each frequency. Changes in autonomic regulation for each frequency were then analyzed relative to baseline testing for each individual and within matched cohorts. Results: Uninjured controls demonstrated no autonomic deficits at baseline and had no changes with any frequency of stimulation. Contrasting this, and as expected, individuals with SCI had baseline autonomic dysfunction. In a frequency-dependent manner, spinal cord stimulation enhanced sympathoexcitatory responses, normalizing previously impaired Valsalva's maneuvers. However, stimulation exacerbated already impaired sympathoinhibitory responses, resulting in significantly greater mean arterial pressure increases with the same phenylephrine doses compared to baseline. Impaired sympathoexcitatory response below the level of injury were also further exacerbated with spinal cord stimulation. At baseline, neither individual with SCI demonstrated autonomic dysreflexia with the noxious foot cold pressor test; the addition of stimulation led to a dysreflexic response in every trial, with greater relative hypertension and bradycardia indicating no improvement in autonomic regulation. Conclusions and Relevance: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation does not improve autonomic regulation after SCI, and instead likely generates tonic, frequency-dependent sympathoexcitation which may lower the threshold for autonomic dysreflexia.

Identifiers

PMID37503177
PMCPMC10371174
OpenAlexW4385163612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.